Skip to main content

All about Anticipatory Bail in India

 All about Anticipatory Bail in India

By Shweta Nair


The concept of Anticipatory Bail in India was previously never there. It was only when the Code of Criminal Procedure was amended in the year 1973 that this section of 438 was included under Chapter 33. And this comes after the Law Commission in its 41st report recommended to include it in the code. This concept has been originated from the famously drafted constitution known as Magna Carta by the King John of England in 1200’s. Bail aids in setting a person free which is related to the right to life and personal liberty which is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution under Article 21 whereas arrest is exactly the opposite of it which denies an individual from this right. 


What is the meaning of Anticipatory Bail?

Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 implies a bail applied in expectation of arrest. Here, the person who is having an apprehension that he might be arrested for a non-cognizable offence, has the right to apply to a High Court or a Session’s Court. It is in the discretion of the court whether to grant him anticipatory bail or not. 


Procedure for Application of Anticipatory Bail

Once FIR has been lodged, it would be decided by the advocate whether an application for pre-arrest notice, notice bail or anticipatory bail have to be filed. Then an anticipatory bail application will have to be drafted citing the reasons for bail application. The anticipatory bail application has to be firstly presented in the Session’s Court. If there are any special circumstances or it gets rejected in the Session’s Court, it can be then applied to the High Court and if it gets rejected there also, it can be applied to the Supreme Court. The applicant can approach any court which he feels is included in his jurisdiction wherein he is anticipating his arrest. The territorial jurisdiction of the court doesn’t matter. An anticipatory bail will still be allowed to be filed. 



Under what circumstances will the court grant an anticipatory bail? 

  • Political Enmity- where complainant has lot of influence and power. 

  • Intention to cause harm to the applicant’s reputation

  • Vague allegations against the accused

  • FIR not filed properly wherein name of the accused is not mentioned. 

  • Apprehension that he may be arrested

  • That the accused wouldn’t abscond and that he has no antecedents and will not hinder investigation or other procedures. 

It will be exercised only under few circumstances like the ones mentioned above that too sparingly which is entirely in the court’s discretion. 


While granting anticipatory bail, few conditions like being available whenever the police officer calls for interrogation, not to leave India without court’s prior consent, not to dissuade anyone by threat or inducement from disclosing facts to the court etc. shall be obligatory to be followed and strictly looked upon by the court. 


Refusal to grant bail:

The court may refuse to grant anticipatory bail in circumstances where the person who is anticipating such an arrest has already been imprisoned earlier, or there are chances that the person may escape or flee, or is proficient in manipulating investigation to his benefit, or if prima facie case can be made out etc. 


In Sushila Agarwal v. State of Delhi, it was held by the Supreme Court that section 438 of CrPC should not be limited to any time period but if any special reasons exist to put a restriction on the time limit, then it may freely do so. 

In the case of Badresh Bipinrai Seth v. State of Gujarat, the court held that Article 21 and Section 438 goes hand in hand, and therefore the legislature has upheld fundamental rights of the citizens. 

In Suresh Vasudeva v. State, it was held that anticipatory bail can be applied only for non-cognizable offences. 

Clearly, Section 438 goes hand in hand with personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. But it is to be remembered that it has to be exercised only in exceptional cases. Otherwise anyways there are people who take advantage of such laws and get away with the arrest. Anticipatory bail should be granted only after considering certain conditions such as behaviour of the applicant, gravity and nature of offence etc. 


References: 

  1. https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/get-anticipatory-bail/

  2. https://www.lawyered.in/legal-disrupt/articles/anticipatory-bail-indian-context/

  3. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-41-anticipatory-bail.html

  4. https://corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/2021/01/decoding-the-law-on-anticipatory-bail/

  5. https://www.mondaq.com/india/crime/982502/anticipatory-bail-and-its-laws
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more