Skip to main content

Anti-conversion law analysis of Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law

 Anti conversion law analysis of Uttar Pradesh anti conversion law  


Introduction

As you may have noticed by now different states have  passed anti conversion laws these laws  restrict the autonomy and general will of the people and also are a  threat to freedom and liberty of people. These anti conversion laws can be dated back to the Colonial era in India, princely states were the first one’s to pass such laws during pre independence era after concerning the general public.

Although India provides for secularism as basic feature of  the constitution still some political parties remain to use religion as a tool for political power apart from this conversion laws are included in the State list of the seventh schedule so it has influenced many states to pass anti conversion legislation.

Orissa was the first state to implement anti-conversion  law. However the Orissa freedom of religion act 1967 was declared unconstitutional by the Orissa High court but in the case of  Rev. Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, the supreme court reinstated the Orissa anti conversion law. At present eight States have implemented the anti-conversion laws  these include Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Chattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh but in this article we will only analyze the up anti conversion law.

Uttar Pradesh prohibition of unlawful religious conversion Act 2020

Up prohibition of unlawful religious conversion act 2020 was a law passed by the Uttar Pradesh legislation to tackle the “ unlawful conversions”  popularly known as ‘love jihad law ' it is described as an alleged conspiracy by Muslim men to convert Hindu women by marrying them and feigning love. 

On the basis of severity of the offence the person found guilty can land in jail up to a term of 3 years which may extend to 10 years  and a minimum fine of 15,000  in case of conversion of minors and women from SC/ST community and for forceful mass conversion the fine can extend to 50,000 and a jail term up to 10 year. 

Constitutional validity of Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law 

Since the law came into force on 28 November 2020 a lot has been written about this law it has been criticized by many scholars and classified as a draconian law most of it is about the law being violation of an individual right to marry a person of one’s choice and also violates right to life autonomy and privacy of individuals  the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion ordinance also violates the constitutional guarantee of equality  because making religious conversion as the only ground for making a marriage void or making certain requirements that the parties in the interfaith marriage has to abide by such as giving prior notice of conversion post conversion notice of declaration is  a discrimination on the basis of religion. The true problem with this new so-called ‘love jihad’ law lies in its ambiguity.


The law employs the use of open-textured phrases such as “undue influence”, “allurement” and “coercion”.

Indeed, even the question of whether a religious conversion is truly conducted solely for the purpose of a marriage is inherently vague.

It is in the subjective assessment and appreciation of these tenuous phrases that the real peril lies – this is a matter left entirely to the discretion of the judge.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more