Skip to main content

child marriage with cases By Srihari @ Lex cliq

 Child marriage act  Ex

It is one of the cases in which a woman has had a project to go through the village. Where child marriage was being practiced from the periods. No news was being reported earlier regarding this reason.  Here when the woman was reporting this incident. She was sexually harassed by the men. Finally, due to the revenge, she died where she was brutally raped and murdered. 

Here the issue was regarding this suit can be filed in the PIL (Public interest litigation). I see the incident resulted in the murder. There will be questions arising in the mind. How can we file under the PIL? There is the option that we can file under the Public Interest Litigation. In the above case, it is called sexual harassment. When the murder was been committed before she was subjected to sexual harassment. In matters of Public Interest litigation, there is the concept of the violation of the fundamental right. In this case, there was the first type of sexual harassment which was done in the first place.  Because sexual harassment is a violation of the fundamental right. In the constitution of the fundamental right, we have the right known as the right to freedom and religion.  But it should not be in the form where it should be harassing the people by going beyond the limit. 

There was a similar case where the court said that there was a similar fact but the incident did not result in murder or rape. But she was cruelly harassed by the boss of the company. Where she was denying her giving more loads of the work. In this case, she was being tortured also. Here the court said that there is the scope of the PIL where it comes in the bracket of the PIL. This case relates to the specific matter of violation of the fundamental right.  Many judgments are similar to the matter of PIL.

There is a wider concept in the scope of PIL. This will be one of the instruments for the weaker section of the society especially the violation of the fundamental right.  In this matter PIL Public Interests litigation. In this concept, this plays a vital role for the backbone of the weaker section of the society that would be beneficial for the society to bring that out from the outcome of the case. Adding this concept there is the involvement of the child marriage this is one of such rights that are been violated by the society we are facing today .

There are different law enacted by the constitution. But there was no such law which was enacted by the constitution.  It is the complete violation of the women's at the earlier stage. We can say that their stage when the concept was been evolved there was no specific reason why they have been formed . The grass root of the topic will be able to better understand the  evolution . 

This is one of the customs they say to should followed but in the aspect of the custom law . To satisfy the custom of the law it should be followed by the in the ancient period of the time . This concept of the time it has been evolved from the ancient period of the time. The child marriage is the set where the it should be stopped in the period of the time. This main people or the loss is not suffered by the society b the children are forced to do the child marriage under the act . People are forcing the children of the women who are under age of the below 12 year are the people who are not allowed to marry . But they have been married from the ancient of the period of the time . This was practices should be stopped indulge by the people.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree