Skip to main content

Consumer Rights

 Consumer Rights

By Shagun Mahendroo


Consumer rights refers to a system of law that governs what manufacturers of goods must do to safeguard their customers from harm. These statutes arose from a succession of judicial challenges, and they have been shaped by the outcomes of those cases. Some states have enacted "consumer rights" legislation, although this is not yet the norm, and even these codifications may not encompass all of the elements that are widely regarded "consumer rights." 

The right to information about the quality, potency, quantity, purity, price, and standard of goods or services is defined as "the right to have information about the quality, potency, quantity, purity, price, and standard of goods or services," as the case may be, but the consumer is to be protected against any unfair trade practises. It is critical for customers to be aware of their rights.

Despite the fact that India has strong and unambiguous laws protecting consumer rights, the situation of Indian consumers might be described as dire. The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 is the most important of the several laws that have been enacted to protect consumer rights in India.

Individuals, firms, Hindu undivided families, and companies all have the right to use their consumer rights for the purchase of products and services made by them, according to this law. It is critical that a consumer understands his or her basic rights, as well as the courts and procedures that follow when those rights are violated.

The essential consumer rights are discussed here:

The Right to be Heard: 

After being exploited, every consumer has the right to be heard. A dissatisfied customer should be aware that if the company does not listen to them, he or she has the right to take the case to the authorities. The right to be heard is a powerful tool at the consumer's disposal.

The Right to Seek Redressal:

Every customer has the legal right to seek redress. Consumers who have been the victims of corporate exploitation can launch a lawsuit against the insensitive firm through redressal organisations. As a result, many customers abuse this right, making it an extremely delicate right.

The Right to Information:

Every consumer has the right to know what they are buying. Consumers should be exposed to accurate and reliable information. Information should not be used for nefarious purposes or be inaccurate. Consumers, in other words, have a right to accurate information.

The Right to Protection:

Every customer has a right to be protected. Consumers have access to the Central Consumer Protection Council, State Consumer Protection Council, District Forum, and Consumer Protection Redressal Agencies. These organisations attempt to safeguard Indian consumers against firms that exploit them.

The Right to Assurance:

Every customer has the right to be confident. Assurance of high-quality products and services. They also have the right to be assured of the wide range of goods and services available to them.

The Right to Consumer Education:

Every customer has the right to consumer education as well. Every consumer protection act and amendment generally includes consumer education. The government should make a concerted effort to share and disseminate consumer rights throughout India. Consumers should also have the right to obtain education on the dos and don'ts of being a consumer. This is an extremely helpful and informed resource available to customers.

As a result, we can conclude that customers should be taught and made aware of their rights and duties. The government should launch various initiatives, like as campaigns and commercials, to raise consumer awareness of their rights and obligations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree