Skip to main content

DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

 DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

  • Introduction

The Directive Principles of State Policy, which are also called DPSP, are categorized in Part IV of the Constitution of India from Articles 36 to 51. The creators of the Constitution took this idea from the Irish Constitution of 1937, which had consecutively been taken from the Spanish Constitution. These principles of the Indian Constitution were determined as “novel features” by Dr B.R. Ambedkar. The Directive Principles, together with the Fundamental Rights, include the philosophy and essence of the Constitution. All the more, Granville Austin talks about the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles as the “Conscience of the Constitution.”


  • Importance Of Directive Principles of State Policy

The inclusion of the Directive Principles of State Policy within the sphere of the Indian Constitution has been constitutional on several grounds which are mentioned as follows:

  1. Public opinion supports Directive Principles. The Directive Principles are indeed, non-justiceable. Legal sanctions do not back these. But these are backed by public opinion, which is, in actuality, also the actual sanction behind the law. 


  1. Provide for a welfare state. The Directive Principles establish the philosophical groundwork of a welfare polity and make it a liability of the state to protect it through welfare legislation. These also give that a welfare polity refers to the protection of Justice—economic, social, and political for all the people.


  1. Importance as moral ideals. Directive Principles are real of the nature of moral principles. They establish an ethical code for the state. This does not decrease their value. Through these, the founding creators brought before the nation the ideals and goals which are to be attained through future legislation. The state is a human social organization. The government is always created and handled by the people. Just as people have an ethical code that directs their behaviour in society, likewise there is every explanation for a moral code created to lead the political behaviour of the men who created and govern the government of the state.


  1. Directives establish a guide for the state. The inclusion of Part IV was ruled by the decision to give a direction to the government for forming policies and laws to protect justice. This was the reason which led the founding creators of the law down that these were “fundamental in the governance of the country”.


  1. Source of continuity in Policies. The Directive Principles are a source of constancy in the policies of the government. In a democratic system, the government modifies after constant intervals and every new government have to form laws and policies. The presence of Directive Principles guarantees that each government, regardless of the fact whether it is created by a leftist or rightist or a neo-leftist or a neo-rightist party, will practise the law-making and executive authority established on the Directive Principles which each government has to grant these as fundamental principles in the control of the country.


  1. Directive Principles are supplementary to the Fundamental Rights. Directive Principles are the optimistic and positive directions to the state for protecting and developing the socio-economic aspect of Indian democracy. These give for those socio-economic rights that the constitution-creators thought should have been given to the people but which could not be given due to the scarcity of resources.


As such, while forming these unenforceable, they made it a liability of the government to protect these from future law-making. Directive Principles focuses on the implementation of socio-economic democracy. These are supplementary to Fundamental Rights which give for civil and political freedoms and rights.


  1. The criterion for calculating the worth of the Government. Directive Principles of State Policy establish a criterion with which the people can calculate the worth of the government. A government that overlooks the act of establishing the Directive Principles can be declined by the people in favour of a government by another political party that is believed to give the needed significance and value to the task of protecting the Directive Principles.


  1. Helpful in the interpretation of the Constitution. The Directive Principles establish a list of the goals and aims of the ideal nation. These depict the wisdom of the founding creators, the goals of the freedom struggle and the needs of national public opinion. These determine into clear-cut goals and objectives given in the Preamble to the Indian Constitution. These depict the philosophy of the Constitution and thus provide beneficial help to the courts in their work of describing the Constitution.


  1. An ambiguity of Directive Principles is useful. The Directive Principles have been expressed in words that are not very stringent and rigid in their meanings. This ambiguity has been helpful so far as it supports the state to construe and establish these principles according to the socio-economic environment, which prevails at a provided time. The Directive Principles are particular enough to direct the way of the state but simultaneously ambiguous enough to support the state in shaping these according to the changing times and social interests and needs.

Thus, the incorporation in the Constitution of Part IV including the Directive Principles of State Policy has been a welcome, useful and worthwhile decision. 


  • Criticisms of the directive principles of state policy

Many critics have been very open in criticizing the presence of unenforceable pious declarations in the Constitution as continue to be incorporated in its Part IV (DPSP). They treat these as “superfluous high-sounding principles” with small scope for certain realization.

  1. Lack of legal force. The critics established that as these principles are unenforceable directives, these principles do not hold any weightage. Their infringement or non-realization cannot be questioned in any court.


  1. Mere declarations. The Directive Principles are a just declaration of intentions or tools of instructions that are to be noticed and protected by the state at their own wish. The Constitution does not form them justiciable and neither mends the time period within which these are to be protected. The legislature is to protect these as and when it may be possible for it. No question then, critics like T. Shah determine it as “a cheque payable by the bank at its convenience.”


  1. Unsystematic enumeration. Another subject of criticism against the Directive Principles has been that these have not been systematically slated and properly classified. These occur to be a compilation of pious declarations noted in the Constitution.


  1. Lack of clarity. Various Directives lack certainty while various have been repeated at distinct places. The Directive Principle with the purpose to help international peace and friendly cooperation between all the nations is a commendable declaration. But the actual issue/question is how to protect it? No understandable direction has been given for this purpose.


  1. Reactionary in nature. Many critics laid down those various principles established as Directive Principles of state policy are reactionary. Drafted during the period of 1947-49, many of the Directives come to be reactionary in contemporary times. The ruling party at a specific time can utilize some of the directives for selfish and political ends. Furthermore, a list of these principles included an try to unduly bind the today with yesterday.

The Directive Principles give for an essential and ideal groundwork for the Indian polity as welfare and democratic polity. The protecting of Directive Principles alone can conclude our democratic system, supplement the Fundamental Rights and freedoms of the people, and create a welfare polity characterized by Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. 

 


Written by Parul Sharma


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree