EXCEPTIONS TO INFRINGEMENT UNDER COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957
WHAT IS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?
Copyright infringement refers to the unauthorized use of someone’s copyrighted work. Thus, it is the use of someone’s copyrighted work without permission thereby infringing certain rights of the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work. A copyright is infringed only when an unauthorized person copies a substantial part of the work. While deciding the case, the court also tries to conceive, how an ordinary person will perceive the work. Section 51 of the Copyright Act specifies when a copyright is infringed.
EXCEPTION TO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
So all of us must have read and heard about Copyright Infringement, however it is not applicable in every case as such. Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 is about exception to Infringement which is read as “Certain acts not to be Infringement of Copyright” However as the Section 52 is very vast, we will only write about the same in few parts distributed among many articles. In this particular article we are going to write about Exception in the case of Fair Dealing with any work”.
SECTION 52(1) – the following act shall not constitute an infringement of copyright, namely –
(a) A fair dealing with any work, not being a computer programme, for the purposes of—
private or personal use, including research
criticism or review, whether of that work or of any other work
the reporting of current events and current affairs, including the reporting of a lecture delivered in public.
DOCTRINE OF FAIR DEALING
The term “fair dealing” has not been defined in the Act. It is a legal doctrine, which allows a person to make limited use of copyrighted work without the permission of the owner. Fair dealing is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. It permits reproduction or use of copyrighted work in a manner, which, but for the exception carved out would have amounted to infringement of copyright. It has thus been kept out of the mischief of copyright law. The defence of “fair dealing” initially originated and emanated as a doctrine of equity which allows the use of certain copyrightable works, which would otherwise have been prohibited and would have amounted to infringement of copyright. The main idea behind this doctrine is to prevent the stagnation of the growth of creativity for whose progress the law has been designed. With the passage of time, India has gone through tremendous technological ameliorations but still procures a very limited scope in the law of fair dealing. But if we look towards the west, continuous advancements through innovative interpretations and judicial activism have been introduced in this field.
EXCEPTION OF FAIR DEALING
Whether a person’s use of copyright material is “fair” would depend entirely upon the facts and circumstances of a given case. There is a thin line between “fair dealing” and infringement.
In India, there are no set guidelines that define the number of words or passages that can be used without permission from the author. Only the Court applying basic common sense can determine this. It may however be said that the extracted portion should be such that it does not affect the substantial interest of the Author.
Fair dealing is a significant limitation on the exclusive right of the copyright owner. It has been interpreted by the courts on a number of occasions by judging the economic impact it has on the copyright owner. Where the economic impact is not significant, the use may constitute fair dealing. The fair nature of the dealing depends on the following four factors:
the purpose of use
the nature of the work
the amount of the work used, and
the effect of use of the work on the original