Skip to main content

Gender Discrimination in India

 Gender Discrimination in India

By Shweta Nair


Gender Discrimination starts even before a child is born, the main apprehension among the family members is whether the child will be a girl or a boy. Some perform rituals for the baby to be a boy. And it doesn’t stop there. Once they get to know that the baby is a girl, either they kill that baby or abandon or blame the lady who gave birth for her entire life. The discrimination continues with regard to the girl’s education, career, workplace, marriage; sadly, pretty much everywhere.

As we all know, India is a patriarchal society. Since ancient times, everything revolved around men. A man will be the head of the family. He will take care of his family. He will work hard and bring income to the family. And what do the women have to do? Yes, guessed it right. Sit at home, make food and take care of house and family. Even after marriage, the couple has to go to the man’s house to live or live close to the man’s house. This disparity has always been existing and still exists today. A girl child is often considered a burden. 

Although Constitution of India grants equal rights to men and women, does this really reflect in reality? No. Research states that gender discrimination is present in several realms in favour of men including in the workplace where women become victims of sexual harassment and are not looked upon equally with men. Gender related crimes are already on the rise. Main being Rape, Dowry, Domestic Violence, Acid Attack etc. Even at her own home, a girl is not safe.

Freedom is always curtailed for her. She can’t wear that. She can’t go out post 8 pm. She can’t take up a job predominated by men. She can’t voice her opinion and is often hushed for raising her voice. And in some families, post marriage, a woman is also compelled to leave her job and look after the child. 

This issue of gender discrimination is deeply rooted in our Indian system and if we don’t pluck it out, its going to continue generation after generation. 

There are several laws which have been made with regard to gender equality and protection of girl child and women like equal pay for equal work, prevention of sexual harassment at workplace, dowry prohibition act, domestic violence act, prohibition of child marriage act etc. Nevertheless, such a social evil continues because the actual implementation needs to be strict and which is not. There need to be more and more campaigns in rural as well as urban India creating awareness of the so-called hushed gender discrimination as most of the times, it never comes in open. Only a few women go and complain. Also, with the helpline numbers for women now, it has become easier. Yes, we can’t decline the fact that people are slowly becoming aware of such things but there is more to be done to eradicate it completely. 

Mindset needs to change. People must begin accepting that women are equally capable to stand on her own feet. That a woman can also be the head of the family. Breaking the myths and stereotype around gender is the need of the hour. Education is the first step for that. ‘Beti Bachao Beti Padhao’ is one such scheme which is commendable and was introduced by the Government of Haryana which focuses on celebrating girl child and educating her. 

For maintaining its position as a Global Growth Leader, India needs to put in extra efforts at local and national level. An attitudinal shift is required for a woman to be considered equal within home and society.

Every girl child deserves to live her life freely and fulfil all her dreams. Let’s empower women and make this country a safe place where both men and women will be treated equal, not only in books but also in reality.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree