Skip to main content

Legal steps to take after a car accident

 Legal steps to take after a car accident

By Shagun Mahendroo


1)Make sure that everyone is safe.

After a car accident, the first thing you should do is examine everyone's condition. If you've been hurt, it's advisable to call an ambulance or someone nearby for assistance right away. Seeking urgent medical attention will not only save your life, but will also ensure that you receive the recompense you deserve.

You can include the findings of your medical tests as proof in your claim, which can help you win. You must, however, ensure that your doctor is on your side. If you do not follow their advice and your illness worsens, they may file a lawsuit against you, lowering the amount you can receive. As a result, try to obey them as much as possible.

2)Examine the accident site.

After you've ensured everyone's safety, you'll need to examine the situation. Here are the steps you'll need to:

  1. Turn on your emergency lights and hazards to alert others that an accident has occurred.

  2. You may reposition your car if it is safe to do so so that others can pass easily. If it poses a higher risk, leave it alone and let the authorities deal with it.

  3. Take images and videos of the whole accident scene, including all damages, with your smartphone.

If you can, gather as much evidence as possible from the crime scene. This is a crucial step you may need to take in order to improve your chances of winning the settlement case if you ever need to file a lawsuit.


3) Contact the authorities.

After you've taken the first steps, you'll need to contact authorities for assistance. The dispatcher may ask you several questions about the incident when you contact them. When responding to the questions, provide only relevant information and, to the extent feasible, avoid mentioning details about which you are unsure, such as who caused the accident.

The dispatcher will send out police officers to investigate the scene as soon as possible after receiving the call. When they arrive, they'll interview everyone involved in the collision in order to compile a police report. After that, make sure you have a copy of the report on hand to aid your legal team's inquiry. It may not be admissible in court as proof, but it aids in determining who is at fault.


4) Gather information.

Exchange information with the other party involved in the collision, and make a note of the following crucial details:

  1. Full name, address, and phone number of the driver.

  2. The insurance company and policy number of the motorist.

  3. The driver's licence and plate number, as well as other information such as the car's year of manufacture and model.

Furthermore, to boost your chances of winning the lawsuit or collecting the insurance claim, you, together with your lawyer, will have to collect key pieces of evidence such as:

  1. Inspection reports detailing the cost of all your vehicle's damages.

  2. Police reports.

  3. Medical records, such as bills, doctor's notes, medication lists, hospital orders, and other documentation from different health professionals engaged in your injuries' treatment.

  4. Loss of income records, especially if your capacity to work was seriously harmed as a result of the accident.

5)Engage in a lawyer.

If you want your case to be successful, one of the most crucial things you can do is hire a personal injury lawyer. The legal system is full of complicated concepts that are difficult to grasp for the average person. You also won't have to deal with your insurance company because your lawyer will handle everything for you, ensuring that you get what's rightfully yours.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree