Skip to main content

Mc Mehta vs Kamal Nath Z zzz

 MC Mehta v Kamal Nath.

Facts: In this case. a Soan Motels Pvt Ltd. who had ties with the defendant Kamal Nath. built

a club after encroaching into a huge ground of forestland. This encroachment had resulted in

the swelling of the Bead River which resulted in landslides and flooding in the nearby areas.

This encroachment was later regularised through a lease agreement

Judgment: The court recognised the doctrine of Public Trust under both Roman Law and

English Common Law. According to this doctrine, common properties such as rivers, shores,

forests are of great importance to the public at large and cannot be made subject to private

ownership. It endows a duty upon the State to protect these common properties as trustee

and not allow private or commercial entities to exploit them. ne court also relles on severa

judgments passed by the Supreme Court of United States: such as illinois Central Railroad

Company v State of Illinois, wherein the court propounded the theory of public trust and held that a court will justifiablv scrutinise an state action which subiects resources, available for

free public use. to the private interest of parties. In Gould v Grevlock Reservation

Commission, the government had permitted the construction of a tramway in the mountain

enacting a statute. owever, the court nrin rom a group or ciens,

held the statute and the contract authorizing the tram construction as invalid

In the Kamal Nath case, the court relied on the Monolake case, wherein the state government

nad authorised the diversion or streams and the court gave authoritative lending to the

doctrine of the public trust and remarked that the doctrine or public trust goes bevond

attirmine the state of its authority to utilize public propertv for the benefit of the public but

to also confirm that it is state's duty to protect common heritage of the people as it holds

such heritage as a trustee or the public. Finallv, it held that it is impermissible for the

government to allow the aesthetic value of natural resources to be exoloited for commercial

purposes and held that the Himachal Pradesh executive had violated their oublic trust dutv.

Conclusion: Upon analysis of the Kamal Nath case, it is clear that diversion of the river for a

develooment proiect would be illegal. River is a public resource and the state holds it as a

public trust which cannot be exploited for commercial and private use.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more

business tips

1. Have a clear vision for your business and strive to achieve it. 2. Hire great people and give them ownership in the company. 3. Provide excellent customer service. 4. Establish yourself as an expert in your field. 5. Develop relationships with key suppliers, customers, and partners. 6. Keep track of your finances and invest in marketing and innovation. 7. Utilize digital platforms to reach a larger audience. 8. Take calculated risks and back yourself. 9. Continuously strive to improve your products and services. 10. Make customer satisfaction your priority.
Post a Comment
Read more

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more