Skip to main content

Powers of State Legislature - Manav Puri@LexCliq

 Powers of State Legislature – Manav Puri@LexCliq


Introduction;

The Constitution of India provides for a legislature in each state and entrusts it with the responsibility of enacting laws for the state. In the case of a bicameral state legislature, the upper house is known as the State Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad) The Legislative Council is a semi-permanent house that never dissolves as a whole. 1/3 of its members retire every two years. Each member has a term of 6 years. The Lower House as the State Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha), The normal term of the Legislature is 5 years. However, it can be dissolved by the Governor at any time. It can be suspended or dissolved in case of emergency in accordance with art. 356 is proclaimed in the state. 


Powers;

  1. Legislative Powers - The State Legislature may enact laws on matters on the State List and the Concurrent List. He can enact any bill on any matter on the state list, which becomes an act with the governor's signatures. Typically, the Governor acts as the nominal and constitutional head and as such follows the advice of the State Premier and his Council of Ministers. 


However, it may reserve certain bills approved by the state legislature for the approval of the President of India. Further, in the event that a law enacted by the state legislator on a concurrent matter conflict with an EU law on the same matter, the latter prevails over the former. In ordinary legislation, the two Houses (Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council when they exist together) have equal powers. 


In practice, the Legislative Assembly dominates legislative work. Most ordinary non-money bills are introduced in the Legislative Assembly and play an important role in their approval. The Legislative Council acts only as a second chamber of examination and delay. 

A bill approved by the Legislative Assembly and rejected by the Legislative Assembly or not decided by the Legislative Assembly within 3 months, after consideration by the Legislative Assembly, takes effect on the expiration of a months from the date of its transmission to the Legislative Assembly. Advice a second time. A bill first approved by the Legislative Council does not come into force until it receives the approval of the Legislative Assembly. Therefore, the Legislative Council can only delay the approval of an ordinary bill for a maximum of 4 months. In case the state legislature is a unicameral body, all legislative powers are exercised by the Legislative Assembly.


  1. Financial Powers - The State Legislature has the power to levy taxes in respect of subjects stated in State List. He is the guardian of the finances of the state. No revenue can be collected nor any tax can be levied or collected by the state government without the permission of the State Legislature. 


The budget and all other financial policies and programs of the state government become operational only after obtaining the approval of the state legislator. When a state legislature is unicameral, all financial powers are naturally exercised by the legislature. However, even when it is bicameral, the real financial powers are in the hands of the Legislative Assembly. A money bill can only be introduced in the Legislative Assembly and after it is passed, it goes to the Legislative Council.


The latter can only delay approval for 14 days. If the bill is rejected or amended, the decision of the Legislative Assembly prevails. When the Legislative Council returns a money bill with certain amendments to the Legislative Assembly, it is the power of the Legislative Assembly to accept or reject them. As a result, with regard to financial powers, the true authority is in the hands of the state legislature. The State Legislative Council can exercise only  limited control over the ministry by asking questions and supplementary questions to  ministers.


  1. Control over Executive - Control over the State Council of Ministers is exercised by the State Legislative Assembly. Little role has been assigned to the State Legislative Council. The State Chief Minister is the leader of majority in the State Legislative Assembly. 


The Council of State Ministers is collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly. The latter can cause the downfall of the ministry by passing a motion of no confidence or by rejecting a bill or a policy or budget sponsored by the Council of Ministers. The State Legislative Council can exercise only limited control over the ministry by asking ministers questions and supplementary questions.


  1. Other Powers - The legislature of the state, in particular its Legislative Assembly, exercises various other powers. The Elected Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) participate in the election of the President of India. They also elect state representatives to the Rajya Sabha. Some constitutional amendments can only be made by the Union Parliament with the ratification of at least half of the state legislatures. 


The state legislature considers the reports of the State Public Service Commission, State Auditor General, and others. It also acts as a forum for ventilation of the grievances of the people. The State Legislative Assembly has the right of adopting a resolution for the creation or abolition of the State Legislative Council.



Author Name – Manav Puri@LexCliq
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more