Skip to main content

Recovery of immovable property

 Recovery of immovable property by Kalyani

Specific relief act 1963 is an act which defines and amends the Law relating certain kinds of specific relief. 

Expect Jammu and Kashmir it is applied to whole India and came into force in 1964 

This act replaces earlier specific relief act 1877.

Section 5 of the specific relief act defines recovery of immovable property, if any person is entitled to possession of immovable property he can recover that in the manner provided in specific relief act. 

In other words this would be a suit for ejectment on the defendant on the basis of the plantiffs title. 

The section 6 of this Specific relief act,1963 Provides a remedy to a person who is disposed without his consent from immovable property otherwise than in due course of law. He can also bring a suit for seeking recovery of the possession notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such a suit. 

Section 6 Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property

1. If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person he has been in possession or any person] claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit. 

2. No suit under this section shall be brought—

 (a) after the expiry of six months from the date of dispossession; or 

 (b) against the Government. 

3. No appeal shall lie from any order or decree passed in any suit instituted under this section, nor shall any review of any such order or decree be allowed.

4. Nothing in this section shall bar any person from suing to establish his title to such property and to recover possession thereof.

The Division Bench comprising of three learned Judges held that a true owner has every right to dispossess or throw out a trespasser while he is in the act or process of trespassing but this right is not available to the true owner if the trespasser has been successful in accomplishing his possession to the knowledge of the true owner. In such circumstances, the law requires that the true owner should dispossess the trespasser by taking recourse to the remedies under the law (Ram Rattan v. State of Uttar Pradesh).

Procedure under Civil Procedure Code 1908 for Recovering of possession of immovable property
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more

business tips

1. Have a clear vision for your business and strive to achieve it. 2. Hire great people and give them ownership in the company. 3. Provide excellent customer service. 4. Establish yourself as an expert in your field. 5. Develop relationships with key suppliers, customers, and partners. 6. Keep track of your finances and invest in marketing and innovation. 7. Utilize digital platforms to reach a larger audience. 8. Take calculated risks and back yourself. 9. Continuously strive to improve your products and services. 10. Make customer satisfaction your priority.
Post a Comment
Read more

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more