Skip to main content

Role of Copyright in Fashion Law

 Role of Copyright in Fashion Law

By Nemi Bhavsar

Fashion is an enormous industry from design to production to retail and everything in between. Fashion is never going away whether it be digital stores or instagram, there's always going to be fashion, people are gonna buy clothes and there will always be cases where someone is copying a good idea.If we don't have copyright protections then it opens up to complete theft of our ideas, of our creativity, of our business model.Your creativity, your designs are coming from within you and they deserve protection.Intellectual property is the basis for protecting your concept and your idea, regardless of whether you're in fashion or in any other industry. Intellectual property is the body of law that protects the creative process. It is simply an intangible property. Intellectual property impacts every aspect of what a fashion company does, beginning with way of products get designed, because nothing gets designed in a vacuum.

Intellectual property law basically is a mix of copyright, trademark and patents. Let's talk about the role of copyright in fashion law.

The court stated that the copyright wouldn't protect the cut of the apparel but would protect the designs.Fashion design which is an original artistic work and hence not capable of being registered as design under the Designs Act, 2000 will get copyright protection in the form of copyright in original artistic work under the Copyright Act, 1957.

A copyright is nothing more, nothing less than the right to copy. It literally means the right to copy but has come to mean that body of exclusive rights granted by law to copyright owners for protection of their work. Copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner.

It is the way to protect your intellectual property and if someone is copying you or distributing or modifying an original piece of work, you can pursue legal action against them and if someone takes work and modifies it but original creativity is quite discernible and quite prevalent, this can also be a grounds for you to go after and protect your copyright.It is designed to encourage more artistic creation and expression by giving creators control over what they create.The moment you put pen to paper to draw or put your unique ideas into your work, you have a copyright in that.

There have been complaints from the fashion designers about their work being copied and the design piracy is taking place. There has been an ongoing debate for the protection in the fashion industry for copyright protection against piracy. As piracy is been done in a huge number the fashion designers should take a step forward to use copyright protection where their designs can still be exclusive and no one can copy or sell the designs without the respective permission.Copyright doesn't protect, for example, the cut of a blouse because it has two arms and buttons.

For example, Sabyasachi's lehenga dress is itself not protectable, but the design of that lehenga is protectable.


If anyone copy your designs without your permission or to borrow extremely heavily from it in ways that are quite discernible that they would be infringing on your copyright, its also important to keep a record of the research and development of the piece your work whether it's the iterations, drafts, mood board inspiration, tech packs, the more data and the more actual information you have that support the original creation of this original piece of content, the better your chances are of protecting and solidifying your copyright.

Well copyright doesn't need to be registered, it is implicitly implied once you create and share a piece and if you are creating the original work, you will automatically receive copyright protection but in case, if something happens, now you have the copyright protection law.
In India, design registration is valid for 10 years and +5 years additional protection (application for renewal).
The design act can give protection only to the registered designs. The fashion designers who have not registered their respective designs would not be able to take advantage of this act.They cannot file a suit for the recovery of damages for unauthorized copying of their designs and an injunction against the repetition thereof.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more