Skip to main content

Social Media Laws and its Implications

 Social Media Laws and its Implications

Social media has become an integral part of our lives, not only for individuals, but also for small businesses and their employees. By using the social platform smartly, SMEs can promote their products and services directly and for free to increase brand awareness. However, improper use can cause many problems. The Information Technology Act, which was adopted in the year 2000 to regulate, control, and deal with concerns resulting from IT, governs social media legislation in India. The Indian information technology legislation of 2000 defines social networking medium as a "intermediary" (IT Act 2000). As a result, social networking sites in India are responsible for a variety of conduct and omissions that are illegal under Indian law.

Section 66A of the IT Act was created to govern social media law in India, and it is significant since it controls and regulates all legal concerns concerning social media law in India. This section expressly prohibits the transmission, publication, or distribution of offensive or unwarranted messages, mails, or comments. It's possible that the objectionable message can be in form of text, image, audio, video or any other electronic record which is capable of being transmitted. In the current scenarios such sweeping powers under the IT Act provides a tool in the hands of the Government to curb the misuse of the Social Media Law India in any form.

However, in 2015, in a landmark judgments upholding the proper to unfastened speech in latest times, the Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal and Ors. Vs Union of India , struck down Section 66A of the Information & Technology Act, 2000. The ruling that's being lauded via way of means of the not unusualplace guy and criminal luminaries alike, determined the Cyber regulation provision to be open-ended, indistinct and unconstitutional as a result of the limit it induced to the Indian citizens` proper to unfastened speech.The repeal of S.66A does now no longer but bring about an unrestricted proper to unfastened speech in view that analogous provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) will maintain to use to social media on-line viz. Intentionally Insulting Religion Or Religious Beliefs , Promoting Enmity Between Groups On Grounds Of Religion, Race Etc ., Defamation , Statements conducing to Public Mischief , Insulting The Modesty Of A Woman , Criminal Intimidation (S 506),etc.

The trouble of censorship of on-line content material in India is a difficult one – the Constitution lets in censorship in positive restrained instances. This is a hassle as because of the worldwide nature of the Internet, it's far very hard to govern content material being uploaded in overseas international locations and being considered in India. Further, the thorny trouble of who receives to determine to censor content material and beneathneath what instances is a nuanced debate – which lamentably has a tendency to be hijacked through arguments primarily based totally on protection concerns / want for large emergency provisions. Most tries at censorship have consequently been haphazard and inconsistent. 

 Further, troubles raised through communal, defamatory and violent content material (specifically toward women) keep to acquire little or no attention. Particularly stressful is the shortage of accountability, transparency and oversight withinside the system. One hopes that the Supreme Court will take suitable movement through hanging down the applicable provisions withinside the IT Act thereby forcing the legislature and government to install area a extra open, equitable and simply structures of censorship that genuinely abides through the Constitutional spirit embodied in A 19(1)(a).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more