Skip to main content

The Contract Act

  THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT


The Indian Contract Act brings at intervals its reach the written agreement rights that are granted to the voters of India. It endows rights, duties and obligations on the getting parties to assist them to with success conclude business- from lifestyle transactions to evidencing the {companies} of multi-national companies. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 was enacted on 25thApril, 1872 [Act nine of 1872] and afterwards came into force on the primary day of September 1872. The essence of the India Contract Act has been modelled thereon of English Common Law. The extent of modifications created within the Act as per the Indian conditions and its ability to the Indian economy is a crucial space of analysis. during this regard it's pertinent to notice that since the enactment of the Act there are no amendments and so the Law that was created in 1872 still stands smart. throughout the whole ancient and medieval periods of human history in India, there was no general code covering contracts. Principles were so derived from various references- the sources of Hindu law, particularly the Vedas, the Dhramshatras, Smritis, and therefore the Shrutis provides a vivid description of the law just like contracts in those times. the principles governing contracts type an area of the law referred to as Vyavaharmayukha. throughout the Muslim rule out India, all matters with reference to contract were ruled below the Mohammedan Law of Contract. nation common law and legislation effective at that point came into Bharat by the Charters of the eighteenth century that established the Courts of justice within the 3 presidency cities of city, Madras and metropolis, to this point it absolutely was applicable to Indian circumstances. nation law of contract, it's been, was evolved and developed at intervals the framework of assumption. By the Charter of 1661 and 1726 English law has deep impact on the Indian system. before the enactment of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the english Law is applied into the Presidency cities of Madras, Mumbai and Kolkata by the Charter granted in 1726 by King George I to the East India Company. it's a matter of conflict whether or not English law was introduced by the Charter of 1726 by that the statutes up to it date would be implemented in India with a similar quantity of force as in England, or afterwards by the Charters of 1753-74 therefore on embrace statutes up to 1774. Anyways, since there was associate indiscriminate application of English law to Hindus and Mahommedans at intervals the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court it LED to several inconveniences. To obviate this, the Statute of 1781 authorised the Supreme Court at Kolkata and therefore the Statute of 1797 authorised the Courts of Madras and metropolis (recorders courts), to see all actions and suits of written agreement nature against the natives of the aforementioned cities within the case of Mahommedans by the laws and therefore the usages of the Mahommedans and within the case of Hindus (called ‘Code of Gentoo Laws’ within the Statutes) by the laws and usages of the Hindus, and wherever just one of the parties was Mahommedan or Hindus, by the laws and therefore the usages of the suspect.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more