Skip to main content

Time of stamping

 Provisions regarding time stamping of an instrument under Indian Stamp Act

By Shreya Verma

As per section 2(11) of the Indian Stamp Act, “duly stamped”, as applied to an instrument means, that the instrument bears an adhesive or impressed stamp of not less than the proper amount, and that such stamp has been affixed or used in accordance with the law for the time being in force in India. Stamp Duty is expected to be paid in full and on time. Non-payment of stamp duty or any irregularity in the payment makes the defaulter liable to be punished and renders the instrument inadmissible as evidence in a court of Law. It is necessary to Stamp a contract so as to provide protection to the people who signed the agreement, as the document is now admissible before the court in case of a dispute.

Stamp duty is levied by the government for the purpose of securing revenue. It is a matter of Union List as well as of the state list. Entry 91 to I list of 7th schedule provide certain instruments for which the Union government will levy stamp duty by setting the rate of the duty. With regard to the remaining instruments, the State government is empowered to levy duty under the provisions as provided in Entry 63 of list II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. 

Stamping of an instrument is inevitable and it is provided in the Act itself that if an instrument is not stamped then it is not admissible as evidence under section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. 

Indian Stamp Act is never read in isolation, rather, it is supplementary to the Registration Act as how the Government will otherwise get to know that there is a private transaction between the parties. Registration Act provides a compulsory registration so as to establish a title to property conveyed by such instrument and the Act provides Stamping of such instrument not to be raised as a technical irregularity but for the purpose of raising revenue by the government as was held by the Gujarat High Court in- JMA Raju vs. K. Bhatt (1976). 

The purpose for prescribing time limit for such stamping is to secure the payment of stamp, otherwise the parties will ignore the payment thereof. Section 17 to 19 of the Act provides for such a time limit and it can be divided in 3 parts: 

  1. Instrument executed by the person in India- such instruments shall be stamped before or at the time of execution of the instrument, 

'Execution' as provided in section 2(12) of the Act means ‘to sign’. 

  1. Instruments executed out of India- such instruments may be stamped within 3 months after it has been first received in India. 

Instrument under this section does not include a Bill of exchange (paid otherwise than on demand) and promissory notes. 

  1. Bill of exchange and promissory notes which are made or drawn out of India but which have to be presented for acceptance are which are to be endorsed or otherwise negotiated in India- such instruments can be stamped before its presentation or negotiation in India.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more