Skip to main content

what basis establishment of regional benches of supreme court constitutional?

 


On what basis establishment of regional benches of supreme constitutional?

 

By swatee shukla 

The Constitution of India talks about justice for all people regardless of economic or other disabilities in its Article 39A. Hence, establishing of Supreme Court will mobilise the cause of this provision. According to P.N. Bhagwati the SC is supposed to look into constitutional matters but as it is, the SC is entangled in appeal issues hence not being able to deliver its former role. Moreover, from the opinion advanced by the Law Commission a liberal reading of Article 130 clearly allows that setting up of SC cassation benches is completely constitutional.

 Under 39A Setting up of regional benches of Supreme Court is constitutional because article 39A talks about equal opportunities to obtain justice for all. Statistics show that the Supreme Court cases are almost always highly dominated by people of North India with 90% of cases from Delhi, Allahabad, Punjab & Haryana HCs. Due to the lesser distance, the cost of reaching the SC is lesser for the people of North India and more for the people of southern states hence, the principle of equal opportunity is failed. By setting up regional benches of SC, it will become easier for people of southern India to reach the highest court of appeal and hence, the constitutional value of equality will be upheld.

 Views of Justice P.N. Bhagwati: If we take into account what Justice P.N. Bhagwati has said “Supreme court was meant to be a constitutional Court and not merely another court of appeal”, we find that the situation of the court does not align with his words. The court is currently overburdened with the matters of appeal, which sometimes take up more time than a constitutional matter. There has been an average of only ten - Five judge constitutional benches constituted per year, in comparison to a hundred per year during the 1960s. As per article 145(3) these benches are required in all cases of important constitutional matters, but courts being overburdened by appeal cases, important constitutional matters are being side-lined. Hence, in the light of 145(3) setting up of regional benches is an important constitutional matter. 

 Under Article 130: Article 130 of constitution of India states that the SC shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the chief justice may, with the approval of president, from time to time appoint. Hence, SC can sit not only in Delhi but also in any other place or places. 

 The many law commission reports: The 229th Law Commission report says that if article 130 is liberally interpreted, no constitutional amendment may be required for purpose of setting up cassation benches in multiple regions and a constitutional bench at Deli.

 Action by CJI with president’s approval is enough, it may also be noted that as CJI acts as a designated persona for the SC there is no requirement to consult any other authority/person, only the presidential assent should be enough. Establishment of the cassation benches of Supreme Court will help the judiciary of India meet the ends of justice by clearing this backlog. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree