Skip to main content

“political”

  The term “political” cane simply understood by the  public affairs of the state, powers exercised by the state government, policy making and authority of the government. A political system seeks to inherently minimise conflict and give precedence to order over conflict. A political system comprises primarily of people/ individuals/groups or collection of groups, this type of machinery functions with the conditions of general scarcity as there is not enough for everybody. As an individual, it is human nature to place our personal needs in higher value than other lesser important things that could be valuable to somebody else. For example, for a blind person, a device that will allow her to regain her vision will be more valuable than a latest new smart phone in the market. Difference of the value of a particular thing varies from person to person and conflicts are bound to arise between or among different parties when there is scarcity in  this possession. For instance if there is only one guitar available in the market and there are three people in conquest to posses this guitar, then a conflict arises among them as they come into conclusion. Political systems must strive to solve theses conflicts by expanding and negotiations, by compromise or by force. 

However we need to properly understand the term political and discuss the importance of the role of institutions  that help constitute political.  Institutions like the legislature, executive, judiciary, non state actors, social institutions and religious institutions, party organisations and the democracy. 

  1. Legislature- The legislature is a body go the government having law and policy formulating functions. This body is influential in giving explanations to the meaning of what is political a they are solely responsible for the laws are rules for the the public or political body known as the country. They have the power to make laws and repeal them as and when they feel that a particular law is not benefit for the  political public entity. The member to this legislative body are representatives that have by elect by the mass public who rationally choose them for  their ability to contribute to the improvement of the country. The legislative helps express public opinion on matters of social, economic and political issues faced by the country  on a higher and wider platform with deliberative discussions and debates. Therefore this law making body plays an integral role on defining what political is and is not. 

  2. Executive- the executive body is an organ of the government to help execute the laws and policies implemented by the legislature, that is not all, the executive body is answerable to the public if any action attracts criticism and  holds responsibility in ensuring proper formulation of public policies and laws. This body is also In charge of  implementing foreign policies and representing our country through diplomacy other countries so that each country’s political ideologies live peacefully in coexistence despite having sharp contrasts. Theses diplomats ensure safety of the country from any dangers of eternal sovereignty. The executive also takes on the burden of keeping a check on the law making functions of the legislature and will raise questions if a law formulated by them is not in beneficial to the public entity.          

  3. Judiciary- the judiciary is the organ of the government that is responsible in protecting the          citizens from policies that violates their fundamental rights are in violation of the constitution of the country. The election of judges to judiciary are done in a fair and impartial manner and these judges adjudicate public policies and actions that are violative of the laws prescribed by the constitution. They keep a check on oppressive policies passed by the government, unreasonable laws restrictions imposed by them and ensure that the ruling party does not transform into a dictatorial governance. For example, the supreme court ordered for the restoration of Internet services in Jammu and Kashmir  which had been imposed by the government.  

  4. Non state actors- such bodies like NGOs are organisations that are not driven by  governmental influence but they still have a certain amount of influence over society, similar to the of the government. They not only influence the society but also have a great influence oner international governance. For example the International committee of the Red Cross ’s campaign “led to the development of a new field of International law, namely international humanitarian law”.NGOs with their large network of globally concerned people largely aid in providing information and raising questions on the accountability of the government’s actions. The are  independent from the influence of the government as usually advocate for the protection of peace, harming and human rights. 

  5. Religious institutes- In a secular country like ours there exist many religious groups each with its own distinct principles and behaviours. There are many researches that prove that religion plays a pivotal role in mobilising votes for elections. This is the reason why many political parties entice  religious affinity in order to mobilise the votes of these devotees. Policies made by the government also should be in such a manner that it does not offend any religion or else conflict in political mechanism is bound to occur. Hence political entities are conscious about this and formulate policies accordingly. For example, a particular region omits the intake of a particular meat, then with majority support this meat can be banned from sale. 

  6. Party organisations- Political parties are identified as a group having the same political ideology and goals. They contest in elections with aspirations to form the government and advocate their party ideologies while running the nation. The legislature and executive comprise of members of there political parities the than contested fro elections. The political party that is able to get majority of votes forms the governments and the other parties act as opposition and behaves in a way to check any faulty move by the ruling party in power. However if there is too much internal disharmony and none of the parties are able to attain the majority to form the government, then an alarming situation is born and this will pose great risks the political system and democracy as a hole of the nation. 

  7. Democracy and voting-  The  people of the nation play an important role in defining the political system in India. The power of choosing the government is solely in the hands of people and this political power vested upon the people are expected to make rational judgements while they elect a leader whose policies will best address their situations. If a voter carelessly casts their vote then it it highly likely the an inefficient government will take power and formulate poor public policies and inadequate laws for protection and safeguards of public interest. Thus voting plays a vita role in helping us understand the term ‘political’ . 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree