Skip to main content

Common Reasons for Cheque Bounce in India

 In the current era, cheques are used in almost all transactions such as payment of salary, bills, fees, loans, etc. and are processed and cleared by banks on a day to day basis. The reason for these transactions to take place through cheques is to secure a proof of payment. However, the vast use of the instrument has also given rise to its misuse as people issue cheques without having any money in their accounts in order to defraud others or to buy some more time to arrange the payment while also causing the cheque to bounce.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What is a Cheque and what is a Cheque Bounce?

In order to understand what a cheque bounce is, it is important to know the meaning of a cheque. A Cheque is a bill of exchange drawn upon a specified banker and is payable only on demand. Legally, the person who has issued the cheque is called a ‘drawer’ and the person in whose favor the cheque has been issued is called a ‘drawee’. The following are the essential characteristics of a cheque:


It has to be in writing.


It should be drawn on banker.


It contains an unconditional order to pay.


It must have an order to pay a certain sum.


It should be signed by the drawer and should be dated.


It is payable on demand.


It holds a validity of certain time period after which it is not acceptable.


It may be payable to the drawer himself.


Banker is liable only to the drawer for the payment of cheque.


It does not require acceptance or stamp.


A bounced cheque simply refers to a cheque that the bank refuses to pass or honor. The receiver and the issuer are charged with a nominal penalty when the cheque is bounced. A bounced cheque also invites legal action if the receiver wishes to, and there have been cases where dishonor of cheque of significant amounts has invited criminal charges as well. Thus, it is vital for everyone to know why a cheque can bounce.


Consult: Top Cheque Bounce Lawyers in India 

 


What are the common reasons for a Cheque Bounce?

A cheque can bounce for various reasons such as insufficient funds in the account of the issuer, scribbling or overwriting on the cheque, signature not matching with bank records, etc. There are instances when the receiver may not be aware of the real reason as to why the cheque has been dishonored. However, it is crucial to know the reasons behind a cheque bounce as it may invite possible legal action against the issuer. Some of the most common reasons for a cheque bounce have been stated below:

 


Insufficient funds


Insufficient funds in the account of the drawer are one of the most common reasons for a cheque bounce. Under this, the cheque bounce takes place when a cheque has been issued from an account that has less amount of money than written on the cheque. The bank also levies a nominal penalty on the receiver and the depositor on such an occurrence. When such a cheque is issued and submitted for clearance in the bank, the bank is not able to find enough money to complete the transaction due to which it stops payment and the cheque is dishonored.

 

Once a cheque has been bounced due to insufficient funds the issuer can either issue a new cheque or settle the matter with the receiver of the cheque. However, if the issue is not settled among the two, the receiver of the cheque has an option to engage a Cheque Bounce Lawyer and start legal proceedings against the issuer of the cheque for non-payment or dishonor of cheque.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Date on the cheque is incorrect or unclear


The date mentioned on the cheque is a very important factor in the clearance of a cheque and any difference or problem in the date of the cheque can cause a cheque to bounce. If the date on the cheque is disfigured or has some mistake, or is not readable or scribbled, it can cause the cheque to bounce.

 

The cheque also bounces in case the cheque has been deposited in the bank after the expiry of a period of 3 months from the date mentioned on the cheque. This is because in India the validity of a cheque to be deposited in a bank is only 3 months from the date mentioned on the cheque. For example, if the date mentioned on the cheque is 12/02/2015, the validity of the same will be till 11/05/2015.

 

Another issue related to the date that causes dishonor of cheque is depositing Post-dated Cheques earlier than they are due. Post-dated Cheques are the cheques issued mentioning a date which is yet to come. These cheques cannot be deposited in the bank before that date arrives. For example, if a cheque is issued on 12/02/2015 with a date mentioned on it as 12/03/2015, then the receiver of such a cheque cannot deposit the same in a bank before 12/03/2015 as it is due for payment on or after that date has arrived only.


Consult: Top Cheque Bounce Lawyers in India 

 


Signature mismatch


Signature mismatch is also a very common reason for the dishonor of cheque. The signature of the issuer on the cheque and the one that is saved in the bank records are supposed to match upon verification before the money is transferred to the receiver’s account. In case the signature of the issuer is not as per the bank records then the bank dishonors the cheque. Thus, a person should be very careful while signing a cheque.

 


Amount does not match in words and numbers


In case the amount mentioned on the cheque has any difference in the payable amount mentioned in words and in digits, then the bank will dishonor the cheque. For example, if the amount written in words is ‘Fifteen thousand two hundred and ninety-nine only’ and the amount in the number’s column is 16,000/-, the cheque will be dishonored as the amounts in both the columns do not match.

 

A cheque bounce can also take place in this case if the section where the amount has to be mentioned in words has been mentioned in digits or if the digit section has words in it. For example, if the amount mentioned in words is ’50 thousand only’ and in digits, it is mentioned as ’50,000/-‘, the cheque will be dishonored by the bank.

 


Cheque is damaged or disfigured


A cheque can also be dishonored by the bank if it is damaged or torn or disfigured in any way due to which certain details on the cheque are not clearly visible.

 


Scribbling and Overwriting


If the bank receives a cheque written carelessly or hurriedly or contains any kind of overwriting or corrections, etc., it will be dishonored. This is why it is always recommended to issue a fresh cheque in case a mistake has been made while writing a cheque. Also, in case a cheque has been received with scribbling or overwriting, it is advisable to ask for a new cheque than using the same as it may be dishonored by the bank upon submission.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue


Therefore, it is always advisable to keep yourself educated about the reasons which may cause a cheque bounce. One must not take dishonor of cheque lightly as there are possible legal repercussions to the same. In case a cheque bounces, the receiver of the cheque must consult a good Cheque Bounce Lawyer and shall take appropriate legal advice for further steps to be taken.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more