Skip to main content

Drafting a Will

 IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION BEFORE MAKING A WILL

Making a Will is often accompanied by morbid thoughts of death. However, it is necessary to be sure of what one wants to write in a will as these are decisions one does not want to leave on the State. While making a Will, one must make careful and deliberate decisions with respect to their children, business and assets.


The following are some things one must be clear about before they make a Will.


APPOINTING A LEGAL GUARDIAN:  

Appointing a legal guardian become most important especially in case of minor children and, in most unfortunate cases, when both parents die or the surviving partner is incapable of taking adequate care of the children. The following few considerations should be kept in mind while deciding on guardianship:

Whether the adult chosen would be able to provide with stable and continuous care

How is the relationship between the potential guardian and the children

If the adult is morally fir to take care of the children

Whether the adult has the financial capability of supporting the children in the long run

Whether the adult would be willing to take care and nurture children that are not her/his own. The guardian should be named in the will only after the following considerations are answered satisfactorily.



CHOOSING THE BENEFICIARIES: 

The most common type of beneficiaries are the spouse, the children and other close family members. However, a person may choose to dispose of her/his assets in a non-conventional way to include dear friends and other people that may have played an important role in her/his life. The following should be kept in mind while deciding the beneficiaries:

One can only will property that is self-acquired.

In case of ancestral property, no Will will apply and the property will devolve as per the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act.

In case the beneficiary is obliged to take care of any other dependant of the testator, it needs to be considered whether such beneficiary will do a fair job of it.

In case of remarries testators, the rights of the previous spouse and children borne from that marriage should be identified clearly.

In case a part of the proceeds has to be given to charity, the same should be specified in the will and not left to the whims and fancies of the beneficiaries.

Cost of probating the will and other legal costs of mutation of property, etc. may be specified to be taken care from the willed property before the division of property takes place.

A specific clause should be added identifying the beneficiary in a case where a movable property may not have been specifically identified to be will. This will reduce wasteful litigation between the beneficiaries.



DECIDING ON THE EXECUTOR TO EXECUTE THE WISHES:

An Executor is a trusted person chosen by the testator in whom the property vests before it is handed over to the beneficiaries. It is the job of the executor to make sure that the wishes of the testator are respected in full and the property is devolved without any inconvenience to any of the beneficiaries. Below are some handy tips that should be considered before zeroing in on an executor:

The executor should be trustworthy and organised.

Family members are usually excluded in order to not increase the pain of dividing up the assets in the time of grief.

The executor should be able and willing to discharge her/his duties.

The executor will have the responsibility of notifying the government agencies, locating the beneficiaries and handling the court probate process.

The testator could also share the location of important documents, including appraisals, warranties, passwords to bank, email and other digital accounts.



IMPORTANT POINTS THAT A WILL SHOULD INCLUDE ARE:

a personal property inventory with descriptions and names of beneficiaries;

relationship of the beneficiaries with the testator;

directions for maintenance of property;

in case there are pets, persons responsible for taking care of them.



SOUND MIND:

A person should be of ‘sound’ mind when s/he makes a will. This means that they understand:

What is a will;

Their relationship with the beneficiaries;

How much property they own;

And how it should be distributed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree