Skip to main content

How to file Writ Petition?

 What is a Writ Petition?

A writ is an instrument or order of the court by which the Court (Supreme Court or High Courts) directs an individual or an official or authority to do an act or abstain from doing an act. A person seeking such an order can file a petition in the respective court which is known as a writ petition.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


“Where there is a right there is a writ”

The Constitution of India guarantees to its people, certain fundamental rights, which by virtue of their name are extremely basic in nature and are required for intellectual, moral, spiritual and general well-being and development. These fundamental rights are enshrined in the Constitution of India in Articles 14-32.


It is true that a declaration of fundamental rights is meaningless unless there is an effective machinery for the enforcement of these rights. In fact, it is the remedy that makes the right real i.e. if there is no remedy there is no right at all since you cannot protect or claim your right. It was therefore thought by the makers of our constitution to provide for an effective remedy for the enforcement of these rights under Article 32 and Article 226 of the Indian Constitution.


Under Articles 32 and 226, the Supreme Court of India  and the various High Courts in India have been made the protectors and the guarantors of the fundamental rights provided under the Indian Constitution. The Constitution under Articles 32 and 226 empowers the Supreme Court and the High Courts to issue writs for the enforcement/protection of fundamental rights of a citizen. Thus, a person whose right has been infringed by an arbitrary administrative action may approach the court for an appropriate remedy by way of the writs.


Consult: Top Civil Lawyers in India

 


What are the types of Writs?

The power to issue writs is primarily a provision to make available the Right to Constitutional Remedies to every citizen. Right to Constitutional Remedies is a guarantee provided by the constitution for the protection and enforcement of all the fundamental rights provided to the Indian citizens. Therefore, in order to enforce these rights, the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court and High Courts to issue writs in the nature of Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition, and Quo-warranto. The parliament is also empowered under the constitution to empower any other court to issue any or all of these writs by enacting a law. These writs have been discussed below in detail:

 


A. Habeas Corpus

"Habeas Corpus" is a Latin term which literally means "you may have the body.,” This writ is issued by the courts to produce a person who has been detained, whether in prison or in private custody before a court and to release him if such detention is found illegal. A Writ of Habeas Corpus can also be filed in case of violation of fundamental rights of prisoners in India.


The scope of the Habeas Corpus Writ has been widened and can be filed for the following as well:


If a person who has been detained has not been brought before the magistrate within 24 hours of his/her arrest


If an individual has been arrested without any reason or violation by him/her


For an unconstitutional arrest i.e. for laws against the provisions of the Constitution of India


Arrest made with a man intent to harm such person.


Generally, a writ of Habeas Corpus is filed by the illegal detainee. However, in certain situations, the court can also allow it to be filed by friends or relatives of the prisoner, on his/her behalf.


 


B. Mandamus

Mandamus is a Latin word, which means "We Command". Mandamus is an order from the Supreme Court or High Court to a lower court or tribunal or public authority to perform a public or statutory duty. This writ of command is issued by the Supreme Court or High Court when any government, court, corporation or any public authority has to do a public duty but fails to do so.


A writ of Mandamus can be filed against an individual or private body, against the Governor, President, acting Chief Justice, etc. It can be issued in order to enforce a private contract as well.


A writ of Mandamus can be filed by an individual or a private body as long as they have a legal rights in the matter.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


C. Certiorari

Literally, Certiorari means to be certified. The writ of certiorari can be issued by the Supreme Court or any High Court for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority.


There are several conditions necessary for the issue of a writ of certiorari.


There should be a court, tribunal or an officer having the legal authority to determine the question with a duty to act judicially.


Such a court, tribunal or officer must have passed an order acting without jurisdiction or in excess of the judicial authority vested by law in such court, tribunal or officer.


The order could also be against the principles of natural justice or the order could contain an error of judgment in appreciating the facts of the case.


If subordinate courts or quasi-judicial courts act in an absence of their jurisdiction or exceed their jurisdiction or fail to make use of their jurisdiction, a writ of Certiorari can be issued.

 


D. Prohibition

The Writ of prohibition means to forbid or to stop. This writ is issued when a lower court or a body tries to transgress the limits or powers vested in it. The writ of prohibition is issued by any High Court or the Supreme Court to any inferior court, or quasi-judicial body prohibiting the latter from continuing the proceedings in a particular case, where it has no jurisdiction to try. After the issue of this writ, proceedings in the lower court etc. comes to an end.


Comparison between issuing writs of Prohibition and Certiorari:


While the writ of prohibition is available during the pendency of proceedings, the writ of certiorari can be resorted to only after the order or decision has been announced.


Both the writs are issued against legal bodies.



E. Quo-Warranto

The word Quo-Warranto literally means "by what warrants?" or "what is your authority?" It is a writ issued with a view to restraining a person from holding a public office to which he is not entitled. The writ requires the concerned person to explain to the court by what authority he holds the office. If a person has usurped a public office, the court may direct him not to carry out any activities in the office or may announce the office to be vacant. Thus, the Supreme Court or High Court may issue a writ of quo-warranto if a person holds an office beyond his retirement age.


Conditions for issuing Quo-Warranto


The office must be public and it must be created by a law or by the constitution itself.


The office must be a substantive one and not merely the function or employment of a servant at the will and during the pleasure of another.


There must have been a contravention of the constitution or a statute or statutory instrument, in appointing such person to that office.


Consult: Top Civil Lawyers in India

 


How to file a writ petition?

Writs provide a fast and inexpensive remedy for the protection of fundamental rights from legislative and executive interference. According to the Constitution, a writ petition can be filed directly either in the Supreme Court or the High Courts. It can be filed for the enforcement of a fundamental right either in a civil or a criminal suit.


A writ petition can be filed by following the below-mentioned procedure:

 


1. Drafting a petition

The first step in filing a writ is to draft a writ petition elaborating your case with details related to the infringement of the fundamental right. Depending upon the type of your right affected and the organization involved, the facts of the case should be mentioned in the petition. It is advisable to hire a good lawyer to draft a petition for you as a lawyer having a significant experience in dealing with writ petitions will be able to make a better case for you in the petition while increasing your chances to get a favorable order from the court.

 


2. Filing of application in the appropriate court

Based on the area where the problem arose, the appropriate court (High Court or Supreme Court) to file the writ petition is decided. A lawyer can guide you with the place of filing and can also help you with the filing while saving you from the tedious process of filing an application in the court.

 


3. Payment of court fees

While filing the writ petition in the appropriate court the prescribed court fees will have to be paid by the applicant. The court fee may vary based on the court and length of the petition.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


4. Admission and Notice

Once the petition is successfully filed after paying the requisite court fees, a preliminary hearing will be held wherein the petition will be considered by the court for admission. The court will consider the petition based on the facts of the case that whether it is liable to be taken further or not and if it is found to be fit, the next date of hearing will be provided by the court. A notice will also be sent to the other party to appear before the court on the given date of hearing.

 

In the final stage, the court will consider the contents of the petition and after hearing the submissions made by both the parties will give a decision as it may deem fit.

 

Dr. Ambedkar in one of his Constituent Assembly debates had stated that “ If I was asked to name any particular Article in this Constitution as the most important- an Article without which this Constitution would be a nullity--- I could not refer to any other Article except this one (Article 32)………………….. It is the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it.”


The powers conferred over the High Courts and Supreme Court to issue writs under the Indian Constitution is an important part of the ‘basic structure’ of the Constitution. The reason for this is that it would be meaningless to provide fundamental rights to the citizens without providing an effective remedy for their enforcement when they are violated. This is why an application to the Supreme Court may always be made first since the right to protection of a fundamental right is itself a fundamental right. Therefore, there is no need to approach the High Court before the Supreme Court when filing a writ petition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree