Skip to main content

How to get your property back?

 Property disputes arise when two or more parties have a conflict of interest with regard to the same property.  As a first step to solving the conflict, the parties try and resolve the issue themselves without an advocate, but if the issue is left unresolved, the aggrieved party can always file a case against the other party and proceed with the court proceedings to get justice.


An owner is deemed to have possession of the property as long as there is no intrusion from anyone else.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Generally, illegal possession is carried out in 2 ways

1.    When goons create false documents and occupy the property illegally by use of force. This malafide practice is quite common since some practice this as their profession. Moreover, sometimes some local authorities also help these goons in such malafide practices.


2.    Such an illegal possession can also take place when a tenant does not vacate your property. The best defense used by tenants is that of adverse possession. It is advised to make a proper rent agreement before renting out your accommodation as well as acquire strong measures to avoid getting involved in such situations. These situations mostly arise when properties that are illegally occupied are left unsupervised by the caretakers, tenants with unspecified status, or properties that have been lying abandoned for years which directly makes them an easy target for such notorious people.


Adverse possession is when the owner of a property is deprived of his rights of ownership resulting from non-intervention on his part to get rid of an occupant within a statutory time period from his property. Under the Indian law, the statutory period is 12 years. After the completion of this limitation period for evicting the occupant, the rightful owner is restricted from carrying out any legal proceedings to regain the possession of his property and thus, allows the occupant to get the title to the property by adverse possession.


The main idea behind this article is to show that ownership without possession has no meaning since the owner does not get to enjoy the fruits of the property.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


Illegal possession, trespassing cases are most common when it comes to NRIs. The reasons for this are– 

They don’t stay in these places which imply they don’t have the possession of the property at all.


They don’t make frequent visits to these properties, so they prefer giving the possession of their property to friends, acquaintances, relatives, agents etc.


Although they just have the possession of the property, with time many of the occupants, relatives, friends, agents etc. tend to feel they own the place since there is no one to check and supervise the property.


The owners of the properties end up getting into oral and unregistered tenancy agreements with tenants/ caretakers resulting in continuing illegal possession by them.


Apart from this, properties without caretakers and tenants which are not frequently visited by the owners themselves offer a better opportunity for land mafia to trespass and occupy the properties with malafide intention.



Related Post: Steps to get back your property from illegal possession

 


What does possession in general imply?

Possession means having the real control over an object, thing or property whether you are the owner or just have the possession of the same. However, even the possessor of the item enjoys certain legal remedies against third-party interference. This protection is only provided against any possible unlawful act of violence against the person having the possession.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue


The rights of persons with possession come from the fact that the owner– NRIs, in this case- haven’t looked at these properties for years and they continue enjoying rights. Moreover, as mentioned earlier too, trespassers can forge documents making it difficult for them to be evicted.


Related Post: Important considerations in a Lease and Rental Agreement

 


How can you avoid your property from getting illegally occupied?

The easiest way to take control and restore possession of your property under the law is going to the court and seeking justice. Civil court remedies are easily available where personal appearances required in the court can be maintained through competent and chosen agents/ lawyers. Legal remedies are available under law to regain possession of properties and even protect any third party trespassing or illegal interfering with the peaceful possession.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


1. Preventive measures for owners

You should create true caretaker contracts and prepare well-defined tenancy contracts. In simple terms, you must always clear the status and/ or duty of the occupant having the possession of the property.


You must not let any person retain the possession of your house for a long period of time. You should keep changing occupants on the property to not let it get illegally dispossessed.

 


2. Legal measures for owners

Under Section- 5 of the Specific Relief Act, any individual who is dispossessed of his property can get possession by title.


Under Section- 6 of the Specific Relief Act, any individual dispossessed may recover his right merely by proving previous possession and subsequent illegal dispossession.


Section- 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code lays down procedure where dispute concerning land or water is likely to cause a breach of peace.


Any individual who witnesses trespassing or illegal dispossession has a right to file a written complaint with the police against the same.


A written complaint can be sent to the Superintendent of Police (S.P) of the area where the property is situated by way of registered post or by visiting the concerned police station.


In case the Superintendent of Police fails to acknowledge the complaint, a personal complaint in the concerned court can be filed through an advocate and the case can then be followed through a Special Power of Attorney when the owner cannot make his presence in the court.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What do you need a lawyer to get your property back?

A lawyer’s duty is to provide full support, competence, and efficiency in court as well as clarity in legal representation to cope up with all such cases. A great number of such dedicated and competent lawyers across the country are available to handle such matters even in case of an NRI who might not be available to be physically present.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more