Skip to main content

Important considerations in a Lease and Rental Agreement

 Everybody once in their life time will come across a lease and rental agreement either to negotiate or sign it for personal or business use. There are certain comprehensive conditions that are involved in negotiating and understanding legal agreements dealing with leasing, renting or leave arrangements for residential and commercial properties.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


What is a Lease and Rental Agreement?

A rental agreement provides for tenancy of a short duration that is automatically renewed at the end of the period unless the tenant or landlord ends it by giving written notice. For these month-to-month rentals, the landlord can change the terms of the agreement with proper written notice. 


A lease agreement, on the other hand, gives an occupant the right to occupy a rental unit for a set period of time - most often for six months or a year but sometimes longer -- as long as the tenant pays the rent and complies with other lease provisions. The landlord cannot raise the rent or change other terms of the tenancy during the lease, unless the tenant agrees.


When a lease expires it does not usually automatically renew itself. A tenant who stays on with the landlord's consent after a lease ends becomes a month-to-month tenant, subject to the rental terms that were in the lease.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


Why is a Lease Agreement important?

A lease agreement is a legal document that helps cement the formal relationship between the lessor and the lessee and ensures that both parties are on the same page with respect to the terms and conditions of the lease. A lease agreement helps to protect the interests of both the lessor and lessee and significantly reduces the chances of any disputes moving forward. It serves as evidence to the arrangement between the parties and provides for contingencies that may arise in the future, thereby reducing the possibility of friction in case of uncertainties.


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Important points to ensure an effective lease agreement

Given below are the important clauses and considerations that must be kept in mind while drafting and executing a Lease and Rent Agreement:

 


Particulars of Parties

The agreement must contain important identification details of both the lessee and the lessor such as full name, address, etc.


 


Rent

The amount of rent payable by the lessee should be jointly decided beforehand by the parties and must be clearly stated in the lease agreement.


If required, the parties can also agree upon and specify the quantum of increase in the amount payable after a specified period of time. This helps protect the lessee from unlawful demands and also protects the economic interests of the lessor.


The date on which the rental amount is to be paid as also the mode of payment must be decided in advance and clearly specified in the agreement.


The parties can also provide for a penalty in case of delayed payment by the lessee.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


Duration of Tenancy and Renewal Criteria

The duration of the lease must be clearly stated in the agreement to prevent future conflicts between the parties.


Further, the agreement must also lay down the process and criteria for renewal of the lease upon completion of the lease period.


 


Maintenance

The agreement should clearly mention the maintenance costs of the leased property and who will be the bearer of the same in order to prevent any confusion in the future.


Similarly, the agreement must also bind liability of either party for major and minor repairs, water bills, electricity bills and other such expenses on the leased premises.


The agreement should also contain a wear and tear clause stating that the occupant will return the property in the condition in which he received it, subject to normal wear and tear, as long as the same was not caused by any direct act or negligence.

 


List of Amenities and Fixtures

If applicable, as in the case of fully furnished premises, the agreement must list out the amenities and fixtures on the premises along with their exact condition prior to handing over possession.


 


Rules of Practice and Permitted Use

The agreement must stipulate the intended use of the leased/rented premises to remove the risk of conflict on this aspect.


The agreement should lay down the activities permitted and prohibited on the premises along with restrictions, if any, along with a penalty clause in case of breach of the same.  


Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue

 


Security Deposit

It should also mention about the security deposit and the exact amount plus when will it be refunded to the tenant on repossession of the property by the landlord. The agreement should clearly state whether this deposit is interest free.

 


Exit Clause

The agreement should provide for the process of exit by either party prior to the completion of the duration of the tenancy/lease and the conditions of such exit, such as penalty, notice period etc.


 


Termination Clause

The agreement should clearly specify as to how and in what circumstances the agreement can be terminated by either party. Whether it would be fault based and no-fault termination or both. Fault based termination rights are triggered when one party breaches any terms and conditions of the agreement. No fault termination is when the parties can terminate the agreement without citing any reason.


Consult: Top Property Lawyers in India

 


Force Majeure Clause

Another important clause that should form a part of the agreement is the ‘force majeure’, also known as ‘Act of God’ clause, which helps provide for unforeseen contingencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic which may prevent fulfilment of contractual obligations.


 


Police Verification

A person entrusting his premises/property to a new lessee/tenant must carry out a police verification of the said party. Police verification is a mandatory screening process to ensure the safety and security of the lessor and the society at large. A failure to carry out the above process is punishable with a jail term or a monetary penalty under provisions of the Indian Penal Code.


 


Why do you need a lawyer?

As detailed above, a well drafted lease agreement forms the backbone of a safe and successful contractual relationship. Therefore, it is vital to engage the services of a trained legal mind when faced with the task of entering into a lease/rent agreement. A good property lawyer will help best protect the interests of both parties and to ensure that neither side is wronged by the other. With innumerable cases of wrongful eviction, unlawful demands, non-payment of rent, among others, burdening the judiciary, it is essential that a lease agreement is drafted and vetted by a trained legal mind to help reduce the risk of disputes and to protect yourself from massive litigation expenses in the future.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more