Skip to main content

Trade Mark : Importance and Procedure for Registration

 Your brand name or your company name is nothing less than your business’s identity. “Trademark” is just another way of referring to a brand. Nowadays, consumers base their decisions on the brand names and their reputation for buying a product or a service. Brand names add value to the business and have become a means to communicate with the consumers at large.


What if your competitor in the market uses a similar brand name and steals a part of your customer base duping them into believing that the products or services offered by them are the same as you?  It would not only harm your business but is also a legal wrong.


Various companies especially start-ups or small-medium enterprises forget to register their trademarks. One of the major reasons is the misconception that registering a company or buying a domain name would be enough to keep the competitors out of line. Another is the fact that they believe incurring cost on such a thing can be kept for a time when they face a legal trouble.

 


Importance of Registering a Trade Mark

Here are a few reasons why registering a trademark is of high importance while running a business:

 


Identification

With the market place being crowded with loads of companies and brands it is difficult to distinguish. The best measure for attracting customers and to stand out is by having a unique trademark for your brand and to build your business’s reputation over it.

 


Everlasting

Trademarks do not come with an expiry date. Once a trademark is registered, it can be renewed every ten years and shall last as long as your brand stay or even more!

 


Protection

It is primary to ensure that your brand is protected against competition. If the brand you are working to build for so long has already been registered as a trademark by someone; you lose not only your business but also the privilege to exclude others from using the trademark. Securing registration of your trademark shall protect your brand, and gives you the provision to prevent someone using similar signs and riding off the back of your business.

 


Cost-effective

Registration of a trademark is a one-time cost. The time period and process of registering a trademark has also been relatively reduced. It takes about 6 months to a year for processing the trademark application. Once the trademark is registered, it is valid for ten years after which it can be renewed timely paying a minimal cost every ten years.

 


Asset

A registered trademark is an asset for the business or the company and brings home goodwill. The value of the trademark grows with the growth of the business. A trademark can be sold, purchased or used as a security for obtaining a loan just like any other tangible asset.

 


Procedure for trademark registration

The procedure to register a trademark involves filing a trademark application, examination, publication or advertisement, opposition, registration and renewal. It is important to engage a trademark attorney for the process to make it easy and reliable.

 


Stage 1: Search for a trademark 

You must choose your trademark wisely. There are various different kinds of trademarks available. Once decided, it is important to conduct a public search on the trademarks database available on the on the online portal of the Trade Marks Registry to ensure that there isn’t another trademark which is either identical or similar to your trademark.


The search reveals the kind of trademarks already available in the market, either registered or unregistered. It also tells whether you have a competition for the same trademark.

 


Stage 2: Filing a Trade Mark application

An application for the registration of a trademark can be filed in multi-class or a single class depending on the goods and services the business deals with. Form TM-A is required to be filed either online through the IP India website or manually at the Trade Marks Office depending on the jurisdiction.

 

The trademark application has to be supported with various documents and a complete description of the trademark for which registration is sought. If you are claiming prior use in the trademark, then a user affidavit needs to be filed supporting the usage along with its evidence.    

 


Stage 3: Examination of the trademark application

After an application is filed, an examination report is issued by the Examiner after a thorough examination of the application in accordance with the provisions of the Trade Marks Act. The Examination report may reveal some objections either, relative, absolute or procedural. An examination report is issued within a month of having filed the application. A response to the same is needed to be filed within a month of receiving the report stating the arguments and evidence to waive off the objections, if any.

 


Stage 4: Post-examination          

After a response to the examination report is filed, the Examiner may appoint a hearing if he/she is not satisfied by the response filed or the objections are not met. After the hearing, the Examiner may accept the mark and forward the application for publication in the journal or reject the application.

 


Stage 5: Advertisement          

After accepting the application, the trademark is advertised and published in the Trade Marks Journal for a period of 4 months. The objective behind the same is to invite the public for filing an opposition against the registration of the mark. This Trade Marks Journal is available on the Registry’s website and is updated every Monday.

 


Stage 6: Opposition

After a trademark is advertised in the Journal, any aggrieved party can file a notice of opposition against the registration of the advertised trademark. The notice of opposition has to be filed vide Form TM-O within four months of the mark’s advertisement in the Journal. If the applied for mark is opposed, then the due process of law is followed which includes filing the counter-statement, evidence and hearing in order to get the mark registered.

 


Stage 7: Registration

This is the final step where the application proceeds to registration after overcoming the objection and/or the opposition against its registration. In case no one opposes the registration of the mark during the advertisement period, the mark is issued an automated registration certificate within a week’s time. The registration is valid for a period of ten years after which it needs to be renewed within a stipulated time period.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more