Skip to main content

Custodial Violence and Deaths

 Custodial Violence and Deaths

By Nemi Bhavsar

Custodial violence is referred to as the violence, torture, rape or death of the person while he/she is in the police of judicial custody. This torture can be physical or mental. According to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), a total of 1,067 people died in custody in the first five months of 2021. On average, 5 custodial deaths occur every day. Annual Report on Torture 2020 released by the National Campaign Against Torture (NCAT) reported that the highest number of custodial deaths were reported from Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh with 11 custodial deaths each; followed by 10 in Madhya Pradesh; nine in West Bengal and so on. The most recent incident of custodial death took place in the Kasganj district of Uttar Pradesh where a 22-year-old man who was arrested on the charges of kidnapping a woman and forced marriage committed suicide. The family alleges that the man was tortured till death whereas the police insist he died by suicide. The truth will probably never be known.India is the world's largest democracy. The increased no. of custodial deaths raises a huge doubt on its police system. The police department, which is supposed to prevent crime and disorder is put to a big question here. Peter Benenson, founder of Amnesty International rightly said:The candle burns not for us, but for all those whom we failed to rescue from prison, who were shot on the way to prison, who were tortured, who were kidnapped, who 'disappeared'. That's what the candle is for.

Article 21 states that:

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to a procedure established by law. In Inderjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014), the Supreme Court held that punishment which has an element of torture is unconstitutional. More so, in Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. (1962), the right to privacy was a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. It held that life is not just mere animal existence, every human has the right to live with dignity. To safeguard a prisoner's right to life and personal liberty, several laws are further laid down, including:

Article 20(1) which states that no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of the law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence

Article 20(2), which is Protection against Double Jeopardy.

Article 20(3) which states that no accused person will be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Article 22(1), which says that no person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice; Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure guarantees a person arrested to be informed of grounds of arrest and of right to bail and so on.

Martin Luther King, African-American civil rights activist rightly said that Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. At the international level, torture is considered a heinous crime against human rights. Several organizations have been formed to take a step against such brutalities.

One question that dwells in every mind is the reason for the rise in the no. of such deaths. As per sources, the primary cause for such deaths is suicide. The prisoners are devoid of their basic right to free movement. They cannot choose where to stay or what to eat. Apart from this, the environment in which they are kept has a very negative impact. Several detainees are not convicts and the mere thought of them staying with dangerous criminals is deplorable.This has a very awful impact on their mental state and probably coerces them to commit suicide. Another reason for such deaths is police brutality. Police misuse their power to maintain peace and public order and take the law into their hands. The most relevant example here is the encounter of the gangster Vikas Dubey while one of the police vehicles was escorting him to Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. The police were unable to handle the simple task of moving him safely from Ujjain to Kanpur. It is still a mystery if this murder occurred in the heat of the moment or was it pre-planned to avenge the murder of the eight police personnel killed by Dubey. In either case, he was supposed to be prosecuted by upholding the law and holding him accountable in the court of justice. Another reason for such deaths is the attacks of the inmates amongst themselves. At times, these result in fatal injuries and the demise of the prisoners. This can be handled by optimizing better security and order in the prisons.

In Nilabati Behera v. the State of Orissa, the deceased's mother complained that her son died in the custody of Orissa Police after being beaten up. She claimed that her son was deprived of his fundamental right under article 21 and demanded compensation for the same. The court held the State responsible and ordered criminal proceedings against the responsible police officers. A compensation of Rs 1.50 lakhs was paid to the family of the deceased.

Several organizations worldwide and the Indian Constitution have laid down laws to protect the rights of the individual. It is a disgusting fact that the police department which is supposed to protect the people is indeed the cause for their demise. It is also true that around 71.58% of the custodial deaths in India were of people from poor or marginalized sections of society.This clearly shows the class division existing within the society. It is high time that we look beyond this irrational and rather disgusting division and look at every human with kindness and humanity. A culprit must be punished but within the scope of the law and not with police acting ultra vires. This could be the first step towards a hopeful and promising future.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more