Skip to main content

Impact Of Social Media In The Law Of Evidence

 IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE LAW OF EVIDENCE

  • Introduction

With the introduction of the electronic era, there has been a requirement for the incorporation of electronic evidence in judicial judgment making. In this modern era of social media, such as Facebook, Instagram, etc, there are various moments where various offenses are commissioned through these social media. And in such a situation, the details in social media are the key evidence that changes the direction of a decision.

Police officers and investigating agencies in the current time have found messages that are posted by individuals on Twitter Facebook and other social media platforms as primary pieces of evidence. These pieces of evidence come under the purpose of the Indian Evidence Act. In 2016, during a press meet, the Union Home Minister, Rajnath Sigh, admitted that the Indian government has created a blueprint on social media so they can easily monitor the IS terrorist organizations about the unfound side of the www which is more often called as Dark Web. This dark web comes in the sphere of cyberspace which is a medium of communication that connects the globe through the internet.


  • Evidentiary value of social Media Evidence

The evidence of social media is one kind of digital evidence. When the majority of people assume social media as a mobile application such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Telegram, Instagram, etc, the fact is it assimilates a much broader scope than these applications. There are links and websites which are utilized to connect with people around the world and are no less than a social media platform, and various kinds of online crime and fraud are commissioned on a general basis.

Under section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, electronic evidence is admissible to be present as evidence. These kinds of evidence are known as documentary evidence. But the sad truth about social media is that it is efficiently changeable, duplicable but at the same time, some social media platforms are more viable and difficult to destruct the content and easily available. Thus, there is a requirement for the court to check the authenticity of the e-evidence such as social media. So, the courts of justice must verify its relevance, authenticity, validity before its admissible as evidence because it may be used against an innocent person.


  • Admissibility of digital evidence in Indian Courts

The Indian courts have acknowledged that social media are the primary evidence in the court. It's not only in India rather various other countries have also accepted the usage of electronic evidence in their courts to see its prominence to establish a fair trial.

There are few provisions in the Indian Evidence act such as section 3 which takes a note of the admission of electronic evidence. In some parts of the provisions, it read as all documents given including the electronic records which are found brought for inspection in the court, such documents are known as documentary evidence.

Another provision such as section 65A and section 65B in the act, has also been passed by an amendment under the IT Act, 2000

Section 65A states that there are special provisions to admit evidence in regard to electronic records. The contents of such electronic records shall be provided as per the criteria given in section 65B.

While section 65B of the act determines the criteria of admission of the digital records in the Indian Courts. This provision sets down particular criteria for the relevance of the electronic records, which is needed to be fulfilled.

The conditions are:

  1. During the formation of an e-record, the computer included relevant information in the computer's output which has relevant information that was brought from the computer that was used. It is important to note that this information is stored or processed information that is particularly carried over for a substantial time period which was through the lawful usage of a computer.

  2. The information that is given in the manner of the electronic record and is used in the general course of using the computer.

  3. The information that is given in the form of an electronic record is a copy of the actual electronic record.

  4. During the necessary part of the period, and when the computer is working normally, or even if it is not working properly, the computer will stop working for a period of time, but the e-records will not be influenced.


Moreover, Section 22 of the “Indian Evidence Act” which become inserted through manner of the amendment, clarifies that once verbal popularity of the content material of digital statistics is beneficial and may be admitted, this is, except the authenticity of the digital statistics generated is questionable, verbal popularity of the content material of digital statistics it isn't related. And the trouble takes place whilst the social media groups aren't cooperating in courtroom docket complaints as they want to breach the patron commitments. In many cases, folks that publish on social media systems which include Facebook or different systems publish through themselves, so there are only a few problems. The trouble is whilst the organization has to offer to get entry to to the consumer records in order that the celebration can show their case and that it is able to perceive the accused/felon. Social media programs which include Facebook aren't an Indian organization and so are numerous different social media systems, for this reason, getting facts from Facebook representatives handy over such facts is verified to be very difficult.


  • Conclusion

Pieces of proof from the social media posts may be of important significance and whilst we mirror at the motive that such social media posts could have in a civil or crook case it's far incomprehensible. social media posts which have been formerly used as we've visible earlier than that if such publication may be used to fulfil a person`s declare withinside the courtroom docket of law, which in reality may be very difficult to show. It is pertinent that such social evidence is comforting that greater than enough proof is offered to confess and help the e-book of the declare this is made at the simple rule of acceptability of any proof in question. However, whether or not such proof is applicable in a selected case, and if that unique precept is carried out to that case in which such social media publish or proof is involved, admissibility of such proof will not be a difficulty in a courtroom docket of law.

 

Written by Parul Sharma


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of Non-