Skip to main content

Res Judicata

                                      Res Judicata


The English Common Law System gave birth to the concept of res judicata. The key principle of judicial consistency drives the Common Law system. Res judicata initially appeared in Common Law's Code of Civil Procedure, and then in the Indian Legal System. The doctrine of res judicata will strike the suit if either of the parties in a case approaches the same court for a judgement on the same issue. Res judicata is also used in administrative law. It aids in the administration of the Judiciary's efficiency in working and disposing of cases. When there are many petitions filed in the same or another Indian court with the same parties and facts, the theory of res judicata comes into play. Parties to a lawsuit may file the same suit many times in order to harass the opposing party's reputation and obtain money twice. As a result, the doctrine of res judicata plays a significant function and relevance in the Code of Civil Procedure in order to avoid such overloads and unnecessary cases.


Res means “subject matter” and judicata means “adjudged” or decided and together it means “a matter adjudged”.

In simpler words, the thing has been judged by the court, the issue before a court has already been decided by another court and between the same parties. Hence, the court will dismiss the case as it has been decided by another court. Res judicata applies to both civil and criminal legal systems. No suit which has been directly or indirectly tried in a former suit can be tried again.

Example: ‘A’ sued ‘B’ as he didn’t pay rent. ‘B’ pleaded for the lessening of rent on the ground as the area of the land was less than the mentioned on the lease. The Court found that the area was greater than shown in the lease. The area was excess and the principles of res judicata will not be applied.


The notion of res judicata aims to improve the administration of justice in a fair and honest manner while also preventing the abuse of the law. When a litigant wants to bring a subsequent lawsuit on the same topic after receiving a judgement in a previous case involving the same parties, the principle of res judicata applies. This applies not only to the precise claims made in the first instance, but also to claims that could have been made during the same case in numerous jurisdictions.

Pre-requisites for Res Judicata

 Prerequisites of res judicata includes:

  • A judicial decision by proficient court or tribunal,

  • Final and binding and

  • Any decision made on the merits

  • A fair hearing 

  • Earlier decision right or wrong is not relevant.

Nature and Scope of Res Judicata

Res judicata includes two concepts of claim preclusion and issue preclusion. After a definitive judgement on the merits has been reached in civil action, the parties cannot sue each other again. For instance, if a plaintiff wins or loses a case against the defendant in case A, he will almost certainly be unable to sue the defendant in case B based on the same facts and occurrences. Even if the facts and circumstances were the same in a different court. Issue preclusion, on the other hand, forbids the relitigation of legal questions that have already been decided by the judge in a previous case.


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B