Skip to main content


                                   SEDITION LAW IN INDIA


Sedition laws was introduced by the British government.  The sedition laws was not included in IPC in 1860 but later in 1870 it was included in the IPC. The law of sedition was first introduced in clause 113 of Thomas Babington Macaulay's Draft IPC in 1837. However, when the IPC was finally enacted after a 20-year delay in 1860, the section pertaining to sedition was mysteriously omitted, claims a study. According to the study, the necessity of introducing the law of sedition was first recognised by the British after the revolt of 1857 in light of the increased Wahabi activities along with the incidents of mutiny against the British up until 1870. As a result, the law of sedition was incorporated under Section 124A of the IPC on November 25, 1870. The ministry of Affairs (MHA) and National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) in 2019 and 2020 respectively, revealed a rapid increase in sedition cases since 2014. The first trial of sedition was done in 1891 in Bangabasi case.


Section 124A of the IPC defined sedition. According to this section sedition means, Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.


1) Bal Gangadhar Tilak case (1897) - in this case Bal Gangadhar Tilak was arrested of sedition and arrested for 18 months and also in 1904 in  his newspaper kesari he defended revolutionaries Khudiran Bose and Prafulia Chaki and because of that also he is arrested for sedition.

The seditions laws are interrupted many times in many cases and said that there should be two ingredients of sedition, they are, pubic disorder and violence. The court in light of case laws said that the acts which threaten states security is sedition. After this sedition cases are increasing and many challenged the constitutional validity of sedition laws. 

2) Kedarnath vs. State of Bihar (1962) – in this case Kedarnath was arrested for sedition because of a speech in which he criticised the government. In this case the court held that section 124A of IPC defines sedition and it is constitutionally valid.

3)Balwant Singh vs. State of Punjab(1995) – in this case the people charged for sedition was released , the people write a slogan (Khalistan Zindabad) but that did not lead to any violence or disturb the public because of that the people are released. 

4) Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015) – in this case police arrested two women who posted seductive comments in Facebook related to shutdown of Mumbai due to the death of a political leader. In this case the court discussed about three important concepts with respect to freedom of expression, they are, discussion, advocacy and incitement. In this case it was held that mere advocacy or discussion is not sedition.


In UK 1972 to 2009 sedition law was practised and in 2009 it was completely abolished. We adopted the concept from UK they abolished it but still in India it is continued to practise. According to the data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), uploaded on its website, cases of sedition and under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act showed a rise in 2019, but only 3% of the sedition cases resulted in convictions. The year 2019 saw a 25% increase in the number of sedition cases and a 41% increase in arrests over the previous year. A total of 93 cases of sedition were reported in 2019, with 96 arrests and charge sheets filed in 76 cases, as against 70 cases, 56 arrests and 27 charge sheets the previous year.



Asha Sebastian.


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B