Skip to main content

The Role of The Advocates Under the Constitutional Norms

 The Role of The Advocates Under the Constitutional Norms

For more than 200 years, lawyers or advocates have played a significant role in establishing the framework of Indian society. Lawyers have contributed to the freedom movement, framing the Indian constitution, legislative members, teachers, social reformers, and bureaucrats, among other professions.

The right to be represented by a counsel has been in place in England for about three centuries. In ancient Rome, great lawyers such as Cicero, Scaevola, Crassus, and others defended the accused. Indeed, as the human race's civilization advanced, that right became clearer and stronger, and it was held and asserted with more vigor. Even Nazi war criminals who were responsible for the deaths of millions of people were given legal representation during the Nuremberg trials.

Constitutional Mandate:
According to professional ethics, a lawyer cannot refuse a brief if the client is willing to pay his fee and the lawyer is not otherwise occupied. No Bar Association can pass a resolution stating that none of its members will represent a certain defendant, regardless of whether he is charged with a heinous crime. Article 22(1) of the Constitution mandates that no one should be held in custody without first being informed of the reason for his detention and that he should be given the opportunity to speak with and be represented by a lawyer of his choice.

Bar Council of India:
Any brief before the Courts or Tribunals, or before any other authorities in or before which an advocate wishes to practise must be accepted at a fee consistent with his status at the Bar and the nature of the case, according to the 'Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette' of the Rules framed by the Bar Council of India. Due to unusual circumstances, an advocate may reject to accept a particular brief.

English backdrop:
When Thomas Paine was imprisoned and prosecuted for treason in England in 1792 for publishing his renowned pamphlet "The Rights of Man" in support of the French Revolution, he was represented by eminent lawyer Thomas Erskine (1750-1823). At the time, Erskine was the Prince of Wales' Attorney General, and he had been told that accepting the brief would result in his dismissal.

American import on the legal ethics:
Mr. Justice George Sutherland of the United States Supreme Court underlined the importance of the right to be heard by counsel in Powell vs. Alabama 287 US 45 1932.

Our heritage:
Indian lawyers have followed in the footsteps of this illustrious past. During British occupation, our great lawyers defended Bengal revolutionaries, Indian communists in the Meerut conspiracy case, the Razakars of Hyderabad, Sheikh Abdulah, and his co-accused, and several of Mahatma Gandhi and Indira Gandhi's alleged assassins. The case of Dr. Binayak Sen was recently defended. No reputable Indian lawyer has ever refused to execute his duty because it would make him unpopular or personally dangerous. In this great heritage, the eminent Bombay High Court lawyer Bhulabhai Desai represented the accused in the INA trials in the Red Fort in Delhi.

The role of the lawyer is crucial in the administration of justice. The advocate is bound by professional ethics, which he must uphold to a high standard. His responsibilities include the court, his own client, the opposing party, and maintaining the opposing counsel's respect. Because he belongs to society's known intellectual class and is a member of the noble profession, where higher demands are placed on him, what is appropriate for others in society may not be proper for him to perform.

Advocates are valued in today's culture. People have a high level of trust in the judiciary and legal system, and a lawyer is often the first person they contact. Litigants invest their faith in a lawyer and trust them with protected information. They had to sign their names everywhere a lawyer asked them to. An advocate's responsibility is to protect his clients' rights and ensure that justice is administered fairly and impartially.

In the task of administering justice, the duties of Judges and attorneys are complimentary, and practising lawyers as a class are an essential part of the system, assisting Judges in the performance of their function of obtaining justice for litigants before the Courts. In other words, practising lawyers, who are basically partners in the process of administering justice with the Judges, have a vested interest in the preservation of a brave and independent judiciary to ensure that litigants obtain fair and fearless justice.

Following our great nation's tradition, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has repeatedly decided that an accused's right to be represented by a lawyer is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away. The Hon'ble Supreme Court even ruled that the criminal appeal could not be dismissed due to the appellants' or their counsel's failure to appear. The Court must either adjourn the hearing of the appeal or evaluate the merits of the appeal and pass final orders.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...
1 comment
Read more

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more