Skip to main content

What is Patent Infringement?-by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

 What is Patent Infringement?-by Vedant Karia at LexCliq

A patent is a legal document that defines and grants the bearer exclusive rights to produce, sell, or distribute an invention. Patent infringement is the act of violating the patent holder's exclusive rights. The government grants a patent for a limited time. If the patentee's rights are exercised by someone else without the patentee's consent, it is a patent infringement and the person is held liable. Patent infringement is covered by sections 104-114 of the Patents Act 1970.

The Patents Act, 1970, was the primary enactment governing patent infringements in India when it was enacted in 1972. It rendered pharmaceutical, food, and agrochemical advances unpatentable in India. It permitted the copying and sale of ideas patented elsewhere in the world in India. Additionally, this act imposed import limitations on the completed formula and established rigorous pricing control measures. However, this act harmed foreign investment in the country by failing to benefit large international multinational firms and violating the worldwide patent system.

India joined the WTO in 1992, and as a result, it became necessary to change the existing law to comply with the TRIPS agreement's provisions. To comply with the TRIPS agreement, it was critical to implement Exclusive Marketing Rights and a mailbox system. Under the EMR, a foreign business would be granted exclusive rights to commercialize a pharmaceutical or agricultural product in India for a predetermined period of five years. The mailbox system would receive all patent applications for medicinal and agricultural items. To bring these provisions into effect in the 1970 Patents Act, modifications to the Act were introduced in 1999, 2001, 2001, and 2005.

These measures, however, were insufficient to bring the Indian Patents Act into compliance with the Global Patents Act. As a result, a significant change known as the Patents Amendment Act was passed in 2005. The following sections summarise the amendment act's principal provisions.

The 1970 Patents Act permits the patentee to sue for infringement of his exclusive patent rights. The limitation term under the Limitation Act is three years from the date of infringement of the patent rights. Generally, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to establish that the defendant committed the patent infringement, but in some instances, the court may determine the burden of proof. In India, both district courts and high courts have the authority to consider patent infringement complaints. However, if the defendant files a counterclaim for cancellation of the patent, only the High Court has jurisdiction to consider the matter. The patentee may file his complaint in the county in which he resides, in the county in which he conducts business, or in the county in which the cause of action arises. Patentees' rights are defined in Section 48 of the Indian Patents Act.

It list down the following activities as the infringement of the patentee’s rights:

  • Using

  • Making

  • Importing

  • Offering for sale

  • Selling the patented process

If the defendant commits any of the aforementioned behaviors, he will be held accountable for patent infringement. Section 108(1) of the 1970 Patents Act allows for the plaintiff's relief in the event that his patent rights have been breached.

The remedies available to the patentee are:

  • Temporary/Interlocutory Injunction

  • Permanent injunction

  • Damages

Patent infringement not only harms the inventor/interests of the patentee but also discourages further inventions. This is why patent laws were created to protect patent rights. However, changing times and needs necessitate revisiting patent laws and giving inventors more protection for their inventions. Achieving judicial interpretations of various patent laws is critical for both the patentee and the general public. Finally, the government's role in protecting optimum interests and helping to promote new inventions is critical.

Vedant Karia


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B