Skip to main content

42nd Amendment of Indian Constitution - Manav Puri@LexCliq

 42nd Amendment of Indian Constitution – Manav Puri@LexCliq


Introduction;

First of all, the Constitution is important as it forms the basic structure of the administration. Secondly, it distributes the powers between various organs of the State. Thirdly, it determines the national goals which include democracy, integration, secularism, etc. Additionally, it guarantees the fundamental rights to the people which are of paramount importance for a person to live. The constitution is also very important in the aspect of any contingency or emergency as it establishes the change in the power structure without any uncertainty.

One of the most significant amendments to the Indian Constitution is the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976. The Indian National Congress, led by Indira Gandhi, passed it at the time. This act is also known as the "Mini-Constitution" because of the enormous number of amendments it has made to the Indian Constitution. 

The 42nd Amendment, also known as the Mini-Constitution of India attempted to bring changes in the basic structure of the Indian Constitution, almost all the parts of the Constitution were amended including the Preamble and the amending clause, some new articles and sections were also inserted. The amendment gave parliament unrestricted power to modify any part of the Constitution, without any need for judicial review. It transferred more power from the State government to the Central government, dissolving the federal structure of India. This amendment had completely turned the tables around and had changed the structure of the constitution which is why the 42nd amendment is also referred to as the Mini-Constitution of India.


Following provisions were added through this amendment;

  • It added three new words in the Preamble ‘Socialist’, ‘Secular’ and ‘Integrity’.


  • The 7th Schedule - Education, Forests, Protection of wild animals and birds, Weights and Measures, and Administration of justice, constitution, and organization of all courts except the Supreme Court and the High Courts were all moved from the State list to the Concurrent list.


  • It added Article 51A to the Constitution consisting of 10 Fundamental Duties, on the recommendations of the Swaran Singh Committee, established by the Government in 1976.


  • Three new DPSPs were added to the existing list, and one was modified. They were;

  1. Article 39 – To secure opportunities for the healthy development of children and; To promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor.

  2. Article 43A – To take steps to secure the participation of workers in the management of industries.

  3. Article 48A – to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wildlife.


  • The High Courts' judicial review power was curtailed.


  • Provided for the creation of the All-India Judicial Service.


  • Articles 323A and 323B were added entitled ‘Tribunals dealing with Administrative matters’ and ‘Tribunals for other matters.


  • For Parliament – The President was obligated to follow the cabinet's advice. It allowed the Centre to deploy central forces in the state to deal with law-and-order conflicts (Article 257A). The Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Prime Minister were given unique discretionary powers (Article 329A). Directive Principles were given precedence over Fundamental Rights, and any legislation enacted by the Parliament to that effect was kept out of the Court's judicial review. The Parliament was given the authority to decide on the rights and privileges of its members and committees regularly. The Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies now had a six-year term instead of five.


Conclusion;

The 42nd amendment changed the face of the constitution, making parliament the supreme sovereign body, excluding courts from election disputes entirely, strengthening the central government to rule as a unit rather than as a federal system, and limiting the judiciary's ability to challenge legislation, effectively abolishing democracy and devaluing fundamental rights.


Author Name – Manav Puri@LexCliq
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more