Skip to main content

Agency

                                 AGENCY

In Agency contracts, there exists a legal relationship between two people whereby one person acts on behalf of the other. The person acting on behalf of the other person is called an agent and the person for whom the agent derives authority is called the principal. In Section 182 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 and Agent’ is defined as a person hired to perform any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third parties. The person for whom such an act is performed, or who is so represented, is referred to as the "Principal" in Section 182. As a result, the Principal will be the one who has delegated his power.

            The law of ‘ Agency ’ is based on the principle, ‘ Qui Fact per Alium, Facit Per se ’ . The meaning of the principle is that the one who acts through another is deemed in law to do it himself. For instance, A appoints b to deal with his bank transactions. In this case, A is the principal, B is the agent and ‘The Bank’ is the third party. 

Who can appoint an agent ?

Any person who has attained the age of maturity and has a sound mind can appoint an agent. 

Creation of an Agency : - 

  • An agency can be created either by appointing in written or it may be orally.

  • An agency can be created by conduct of the party or situation or Estoppel. For instance, A sends his friend S everywhere for dealings and meetings. The third party believes that S is an agent but in reality it is not been written anywhere. However, the conduct of S shows him as an agent. 

  • An agent can be created by ratification. Ratification is a principal's approval of an act of its agent that lacked the authority to bind the principal legally. For instance, A sends B to go to a school and make dealings with it for book supply. B also does a dealing of college supplies. Thus, A will have to agree for the college even though the authority exceeded. 

  • An agent can be created by necessity. This means that when a person acts for another in an emergency situation without express authority to do so. 

Duty of an Agent

The duty of an Agent is to execute mandate, follow instructions or customs, reasonable care and skill, avoid conflict of interest, not to make secret profit, remit sums, maintain accounts, not to delegate. Delegatus Non Potest Delegare means that if I delegate you to do something, you cannot delegate it further.

Landmark Judgment 

Kuchwar Lime & Stone Co. v. Dehri Rohtas Light Railway Co. Ltd. & Anr. 

CITATION: 1969 AIR 193 

FACTS: The appellant Company's carriage to Banjari station had booked a quantity of coal on the respondent Railway's line, and the Appellant Company had to pay the freight on the consignment. Because of the poor quality of the coal, the Company refused to accept delivery of a portion of the consignment, which arrived in Banjari on November 12, 1954. After some discussion between the parties and with the Coal Controller, the Railway sold the coal at public auction on June 2, 1955, after providing the appellant with a notice. It then filed suit against the Company, alleging unpaid freight and demurrage charges for 202 days, during which six waggoons carrying coal were held, and ‘sought a judgment for Rs. 17,625/14/- after deducting the amount realized from the sale of the coal.

ISSUES: Is the consignee liable for payment if he refuses to accept the shipment? Is the railway entitled to full demurrage or must it unload and claim demurrage for a reasonable period?

 HELD: The consignee could only be held responsible for wharfage, according to the Supreme Court. The argument that the consignee can only be held liable for demurrage if he accepts delivery of goods was found to be without merit. Even if the consignee does not take delivery, the Railway is generally allowed to make him responsible for demurrage if the waggon is held for his benefit.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more