Skip to main content

allowance for spoiled stamp

 Provision to recover Allowance for Spoiled Stamp under the Stamp Act.

By Shreya Verma

We undergo multiple transactions throughout our lives. Also, we have been asked to get a document to be stamped. What is a stamp? why this Stamping is necessary? Can stamps be wasted? Can we be refunded if such a stamp is wasted or spoiled? These topics will be discussed in this article. 

 A stamp is a mark, seal or endorsement by an authority. The purpose of Stamping is to indicate the genuineness of a document through which transaction has been done also it is a way of securing revenue by the state. Spoiled Stamp means the one which has been rendered unfit for use as been disfigured.

  • When a stamp is spoiled: 

(1) When either unintentionally or mistakenly, an error/ omission has been committed, due to which the instrument has been rendered unfit for use. 

(2) Document is written on stamp paper but it has not been executed. 

(3) Bill of exchange or promissory note though stamped, 

- does not bear signature necessary for acceptance; or 

- is not being used in the intended manner;

- has been spoiled because of any error or omission and same has been substituted by other one.  

(4) Any instrument bearing stamp, though executed, but is a either void ab initio or unfit because of any error/ mistake or if it could not be executed because of refusal or death of acceptor.  

(5) If another instrument is used instead of instrument bearing stamp becomes spoiled.

  • Allowance for spoiled Stamp: Section 49 of the Indian Stamp Act lays down provisions regarding payment of allowance by the Collector in case it is, as per any circumstances mentioned therein, has been rendered to be unfit for use. 

In Section 47 of the Act, it can be seen that there are three situations which contemplates for the refund of the value of impressed spoiled stamps: 

(1) before the execution of any instrument, when the stamp on any paper is inadvertently or undesignedly spoiled, obliterated or otherwise rendered unfit for the intended purpose; 

(2) the stamp on any document which is written but wholly or partly but not signed or executed by any party thereto; 

(3) situations after execution of the instrument.

Chapter 5 of the Act deals with similar cases when either the stamp is spoiled or misused or has been rendered to be unfit by any other mean, then, the person who has bought such stamp by paying full duty and with Bonafide intention can get a refund by the collector. Purpose behind this provision is to compensate the Bonafide purchaser. 

  • So, if due to any of the reasons above any instrument is rendered unfit for use, then, an application for relief by way of allowance must be made within- 

  • Six months in case when no instrument is executed on stamp paper or 

  • If the stamp is executed, then the time has to be calculated from the date of instrument or execution whatever is the case. 

  • And as such instrument is spoiled by reason of refusal of any person to act under the instrument, then an application is to be made to the collector for allowance. Such anm application must be made within two months. 

  • How is this allowance given: As under section 53 allowance for spoiled stamp may be given by the collector by way of giving:

i. Stamp of same description. 

ii. Stamp of different description but same value. 

iii. Money of same value but after deducing 10 Paisa for each rupee. 

Thus, if a stamp is spoiled by any manner provided in the Act, then, upon an application to the collector, within 6 months of either receiving/ executing the instrument, if the same has not been executed or received allowance for spoiled stamp can be recovered. For this purpose, an application has to be made to the collector and if the collector is satisfied that the person has paid full duty with respect to such stamp and has a Bonafide intention then he may make an allowance by paying money of the amount of that stamp for issuing other stamps of the same amount.

The Supreme court Abdul Jaleel vs State Of Kerala 2005 held that, in the light of Section 47(c) it is clear that even after the execution of the document the Collector is empowered to make allowance and order refund of the value of the stamp, subject to the conditions stipulated therein.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more