Skip to main content

Child custody with respect to Indian laws

 Child custody with respect to Indian laws

Introduction

The custody of a child after the separation of the parents is a burning issue. Often movies and books have quoted the amount of trauma that a child has to go through to see the bitter process of their parents separating. The issue of the custody of a child arises after the completion of the divorce or the judicial separation and is one of the most important issues on which the court must decide.

Custody of a child refers to the right given to a parent by the court to look after the child (if the child is less than 18 years of age). The parent in whom the custodial right is vested is supposed to look after the financial security, maintenance of the child with regard to proper lifestyle, healthcare, emotional, physical and medical development. The other parent is provided with the only right to access and meet the child. The family courts while debating on the issue of custody, base their decision on the best interests of the child in question.  

Factors which contribute to the welfare of a child

The family courts when handing over the custodial rights to one of the parents, the decision is based on the attempt to assure the best possible future of the child in question. The question of welfare is decided on four distinct parameters; they are:

  • Proper ethical upbringing of the child in question.

  • Assurance of safety of the child.

  • Imparting quality education.

  • The guardian in whom the custodian rights is vested must be financially well to do. 

Rights of parents over minor child after divorce

In the case of a minor child, both the parents have equal rights over the child after divorce. Here, equal right refers to the right to the custody of the child. However, the family court gets the last say in this regard. The central piece of legislation having provisions to address the issue is the Guardian and Ward Act, enacted in 1890 which is primarily secular in nature. However, the provisions of this Act are often in stark contrast to the provisions of the statutes dealing with personal laws. The oversight of the family court is important in this regard because while pronouncing its verdict, the court aims to strike a balance between the two. The custody of the child is given to any one parent at a time based on the previous factors mentioned above. The other parent is given the right to access to stay in touch. The right to access is a potent right in the hand of the other parent because it makes sure that the parent with the custodial right actually takes care of the child. The conditions of the visiting rights are however set by the court. The provision of the access rights ensures that the child gets the love and affection of both the parents.

Forms of child custody available in India

The family court in India, when vesting custody right, resorts to any of the four forms listed below:

  • Physical custody of the child 

When a parent is awarded a decree of physical custody, it means that the child will be under the guardianship of the parent and the other parent shall be given due permission so that they can meet with the child from time to time. This form of custody is the most prevalent method to ensure that the child gets all the benefits of family and has the best upbringing possible. The environment around the child is made fulfilling and enriching while trying to not deprive the child of affection of his parents during his formative years.

  • Awarding of joint custody 

In cases of joint custody, the custody rights are vested in both the parents allowing them to keep the child in turns. Joint custody, contrary to the common belief, does not mean that the separated couple still have to share the same roof even after the courts have ratified their divorce. The joint custody happens to be one of the best solutions in the custody battle primarily because of two reasons. First and foremost is the fact that no parent feels deprived. No matter the term, custody rights cannot be compared with access rights. Hence, the grant of joint custody rights ensures that both the parents play a significant part in the growth of the child’s life. The second advantage of a joint custody is that the child gets the affection of both the parents equally. No matter the arrangements, the child who has gone through the separation of his or her parents is left with a psychological scar. This arrangement allows the child to receive the attention of both his parents equally.

  • Third party custody

As the name suggests, the custodial right lies with neither of the biological parents. This is because the court deems that both the parents are incapable of raising a child and to let anyone of them have the rights of the child would not be beneficial for the child. A third party who is in some way related to the parents is given the right to be the guardian of the child.

  • Sole custody

In case of sole custody, the entire right regarding the custody of the child relies on one biological parent. The other parent is completely kept away and is not given any right over the child due to previous history of abusive behavior, or are incapable of being beneficial to the child in some fashion.

Determination of the kind of custody to be granted

Until the court pronounces a final order based on the above stipulated conditions, the parent who is vested with the custody of the child ends up with the physical custody as well as the legal custody of the child. Any other form of custody or any other arrangement will be made clear by the court and the clarification shall be informed to both the parents.

Custody rights of a child and who can claim it

The custody of the child can be claimed by either the mother or the father after the divorce or the judicial separation. However, in situations where both of the parents are deemed unfit for custody or both of them are deceased, the grandparents from the maternal or the paternal side or some other relative of the separated family can claim the custody rights of the child. In most cases, the court appoints a third person as a guardian in order to ensure proper safety of the child.  

Determination of the priority of claim of custody

The custody battle for the child is an intense and a delicate issue for the court. When presented with the question, the apex court of India, i.e., the Supreme Court and other courts as well have held that the only criteria to adjudge the vesting of custody rights is the benefit of the child.  

As per the provisions of both the Hindu Law and the secular law, the custody of a child below five years of age is generally given to a mother.In cases of older boys, the fathers are generally given the custody while the mother is awarded the custody of older girls. During the process of determining the decision of whom to vest the custodial rights of the child, the child’s views are also taken into consideration if the child is above nine years. Since the main criteria is the well being of the child, mothers who have been abusive in the past are not given custody rights after separation. 

Step-mother vs custody of a child

Often it is argued that the mother cannot be considered able on grounds that she does not earn sufficiently and thus, the awarding of custody rights of the child to the mother would not be in the best interests of the child. On the other hand, it could be observed that the father contesting the claims already had issues from his second marriage. In this case, the mother shall be awarded the custody rights because being economically weak is not a reason to not be awarded custodial rights. On top of that, the step-mother’s affection will naturally be directed towards her own children. Hence the courts often agree that not only will the custody of the children in question be given to the mother but the father also has to pay for the upbringing of the children. 

Custody laws in India: a brief overview

India being the residence of people from various communities, have different personal laws to deal with the issues arising out of society. In certain situations, the central legislations are sometimes in sharp contrast with the personal laws. The different personal laws dealing with custody of the child after separation of the parents are:

  • Custodial rights under Hindu law

The marriage and the subsequent separation laws are dealt with by the personal Hindu Laws. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954 stipulates the rules and regulations for the transfer of custodial rights of a minor after separation:

1. Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

The provisions stipulated under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act addresses the education and the maintenance of the child only when both the parents are followers of the Hindu religion. Under this law, the orders can be passed at any juncture of time, overriding the pending decree within a period of 60 days from the date of service of notice. 

2. Section 38 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954

The provision deals with the custodial rights in case of the parents belonging to different religions. Under this law, the orders can be passed at any juncture of time, overriding the pending decree within a period of 60 days from the date of service of notice.

3. Hindu minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

The provisions do not take into consideration the third party custodial rights. The provisions of this Act talks about the custodial rights between the biological parents only and subject to the fact that they are Hindu.

  • Custody of child under Muslim law

Under the provisions of Muslim Law, the natural custody of the child rests with the mother until the child reaches the age of seven after which the father is considered the natural guardian. The age limit is set to seven since the age of being considered a major is directly synonymous to the age of puberty. 

  • Custody of child under Christian law

The custodial rights of a child after the separation of a Christian parent is dealt under the regulations set in the provisions under Section 41 of the Divorce Act, 1869. The child’s welfare plays a vital role as the parents have to prove themselves capable of the responsibility of rearing the child. The court may deny custody in case it is not satisfied with the abilities of the parents. 

  • Custody under Parsi law

The custody rights are managed by the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The Act primarily aims at the betterment of the child and has multiple legal provisions to ensure the same. 

Conclusion 

The custody of a child remains one of the most sensitive and convoluted issues caused due to the separation proceedings of the parents. The custody, as seen, is guided mainly by the middle ground established by the judges on this regard. There has been a marked controversy between the various religious laws and the uniform legislation enacted by the State. However, the controversy regarding the various viewpoints of law should not compromise the future of the child. While resolving various pieces of legislation, it should be remembered that the welfare of the child along with assured social security is the prime motive behind the custody of a child. Hence, any hindrance caused by law in this front should be addressed to and then rectified.  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more