Skip to main content

Definition of Fire Insurance

 ACThe fire insurance business has been defined under Section 2(6A) of the Insurance Act,1938. Fire insurance can be defined as a contract of insurance with an agreed consideration with the objective to indemnify the assured from loss caused by damage or destruction of property by fire.

1. Contract of Insurance-. From the above definition, it is clear that like other insurance fire insurance also satisfies and possesses all the essentials of a valid contract. Any other insurance might look like fire insurance because one of the clauses in such insurance covers loss against the fire. But a contract of Insurance will be treated as fire insurance only when the main objective of such insurance is to cover or insure against loss or damage caused by the fire and the peril which has been insured is fire and nothing else.

2. Consideration- Consideration plays an important role in fire insurance like other insurance. Without consideration, the contract of fire insurance becomes nudum pactum which means it’s a bare promise. Consideration like other insurance has to be paid in the form of a premium whether one time or periodically as per the contract of Insurance. It is to be noted that until and unless a premium has been fixed by the insurer and accepted by the insured the contract cannot be called as concluded. Before the finality of the fire insurance, the insurer ascertains and analyses all the matters affecting the risk. Accordingly, the rates differ depending upon the extent of risk sought to be protected. 

3. Subject-matter of Insurance- Subject matter of the contract of insurance is different from the subject matter of the contract. The subject matter of the contract is solely money only but the subject matter of insurance is different depending upon the kind and type of insurance. The sole purpose of the insurer is to indemnify the property of assured against the loss caused by any damage or destruction by the fire. Thus, the contract of fire insurance pre-supposes the existence of a physical object which can or is capable of being insured. This physical object is termed as the subject matter of fire insurance which can be insured. It is important to note that the objective of the fire insurance contract is to minimize the loss but not to prevent accidents.

Law Governing Fire Insurance-

As we see the statutes, we can observe that there are no statutory laws that govern fire insurance, unlike marine insurance which is regulated by the Indian Marine Insurance Act,1963. The closest statute which defines the fire insurance business is The Insurance Act,1938. But the Insurance Act doesn’t lay any specific provisions regarding fire insurance but the act deals with various regulations regarding the insurance business in general. Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act,1872 also doesn’t specify anything regarding fire insurance. Thus, it is difficult to deal with fire insurance when the laws are not clear about it. And as a result, the Indian Courts are dealing with fire insurance with the general laws of Contract and various Judicial decisions and to a great extent by referring to English case laws and various opinions of jurists. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...
1 comment
Read more

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more