Skip to main content

NRI marriage and Pre-Nuptial Marriage



NRI marriages, as generally understood are between an Indian woman from India and an Indian man residing in another country (thus NRI – non- resident Indian), either as Indian citizen (when he would legally be an ‘NRI’) or as citizen of that other country (when he would legally be a PIO – person of Indian origin). The issue of NRI marriages have gained paramount importance over the years as the problem of Indian woman trapped in fraudulent marriages with NRI’s and PIO’s, has assumed alarming dimensions. This has necessitated an urgent need to build safeguards to protect these women and make them aware of their legal rights and equip them with the knowledge of the laws of the foreign country and the rights they enjoy there, especially against any form of abuse, including domestic violence. 


Every NRI who marries a citizen of India or another NRI shall register his marriage within 30 days. In case an NRI falls to register the marriage within 30 days, the passport authority may impound his passport. The bill adds a provision to the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. If summons could not be served to a person, it may be served by uploading it on a designated website. If the person summoned does not appear before the court, it may upload a warrant for arrest on the website. 

The bill does not allow a late registration beyond the 30-day period. Non-registration could result in impounding of passport which may have consequences such as deportation. The bill amends the CrPC on the process of summons. This amendment is not restricted to offences under the bill, but will cover all matters under the CrPC. An NRI is defined as an Indian citizen, who resides outside of India. Unlike, other laws, the bill does not specify the minimum number of days abroad to qualify as an NRI. 


Article 10 of Hague convention on recognition of divorces and legal separation: 

  1. “recognition may be refused if recognition would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the recognizing states”.


  • A contrary entered between parties prior to marriage that determines each party’s rights in the other’s property, spousal support, and other related issues in case of divorce or death. 

  • The pre-nuptial/ante-nuptial agreements are becoming a commonly accepted instrument to protect property especially in the United States of America. 

  • Traditionally, courts were move receptive to premarital agreements that provided for property distribution at death than those that prescribed the consequences of divorce. 

  • As restrictive divorce laws have given way to no-fault regimes, pre-nuptial contracting has gained wide acceptance.

  • The right of a child to support may not be adversely affected by a premarital agreement. 

  • If an agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support and the dependent assistance, the court may require the other spouse to pay spousal support notwithstanding the agreement. 


Prenuptial agreements are not governed by the Indian Marriage laws: can section 10 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 be said to be applicable to pre-nuptial agreements?

Section 10: all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. 

Section 23 of the ICA, 1872: the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless it is forbidden by law, or is of such nature that, if permitted it would defeat the provisions of nay law or is fraudulent of involves or implies. Injury to the person or property of another, or the court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy. 

  • Traditionally, marriages in India are a sacrament and a contract. So, pre-nuptial agreements are against public policy. However, with acceptance towards the contractual nature of marriage, public policy is also subject to change.  

  • There has been an increasing trend of signing pre-nuptial agreements in India, specially, urban India. Whereas, there has been no case where it has been upheld by any court of law. 


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B