Skip to main content

NRI marriage and Pre-Nuptial Marriage

 NRI MARRIAGES AND PRE-NUPTIAL AGREEMENTS


INTRODUCTION: 

NRI marriages, as generally understood are between an Indian woman from India and an Indian man residing in another country (thus NRI – non- resident Indian), either as Indian citizen (when he would legally be an ‘NRI’) or as citizen of that other country (when he would legally be a PIO – person of Indian origin). The issue of NRI marriages have gained paramount importance over the years as the problem of Indian woman trapped in fraudulent marriages with NRI’s and PIO’s, has assumed alarming dimensions. This has necessitated an urgent need to build safeguards to protect these women and make them aware of their legal rights and equip them with the knowledge of the laws of the foreign country and the rights they enjoy there, especially against any form of abuse, including domestic violence. 

REGISTRATION OF MARRIAGE OF NON-RESIDENT BILL, 2019:

Every NRI who marries a citizen of India or another NRI shall register his marriage within 30 days. In case an NRI falls to register the marriage within 30 days, the passport authority may impound his passport. The bill adds a provision to the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. If summons could not be served to a person, it may be served by uploading it on a designated website. If the person summoned does not appear before the court, it may upload a warrant for arrest on the website. 

The bill does not allow a late registration beyond the 30-day period. Non-registration could result in impounding of passport which may have consequences such as deportation. The bill amends the CrPC on the process of summons. This amendment is not restricted to offences under the bill, but will cover all matters under the CrPC. An NRI is defined as an Indian citizen, who resides outside of India. Unlike, other laws, the bill does not specify the minimum number of days abroad to qualify as an NRI. 

INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF DIVORCE AND SEPARATION 

Article 10 of Hague convention on recognition of divorces and legal separation: 

  1. “recognition may be refused if recognition would be manifestly contrary to the public policy of the recognizing states”.

PRE-NUPITAL AGREEMENT:

  • A contrary entered between parties prior to marriage that determines each party’s rights in the other’s property, spousal support, and other related issues in case of divorce or death. 

  • The pre-nuptial/ante-nuptial agreements are becoming a commonly accepted instrument to protect property especially in the United States of America. 

  • Traditionally, courts were move receptive to premarital agreements that provided for property distribution at death than those that prescribed the consequences of divorce. 

  • As restrictive divorce laws have given way to no-fault regimes, pre-nuptial contracting has gained wide acceptance.

  • The right of a child to support may not be adversely affected by a premarital agreement. 

  • If an agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support and the dependent assistance, the court may require the other spouse to pay spousal support notwithstanding the agreement. 

PRE-NUPTIAL AGREEMENTS IN INDIA:

Prenuptial agreements are not governed by the Indian Marriage laws: can section 10 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 be said to be applicable to pre-nuptial agreements?

Section 10: all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. 

Section 23 of the ICA, 1872: the consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless it is forbidden by law, or is of such nature that, if permitted it would defeat the provisions of nay law or is fraudulent of involves or implies. Injury to the person or property of another, or the court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy. 

  • Traditionally, marriages in India are a sacrament and a contract. So, pre-nuptial agreements are against public policy. However, with acceptance towards the contractual nature of marriage, public policy is also subject to change.  

  • There has been an increasing trend of signing pre-nuptial agreements in India, specially, urban India. Whereas, there has been no case where it has been upheld by any court of law. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of Non-