Skip to main content

Response to violation against

 Response to Violence against Woman

In my pervious video I talked about the violence against woman and in this Article I’m particularly going to about the responses which can be taken against the violation of woman. I used the data from WHO (world health organization) to suffice the purpose of this Article. 

Introduction; Violation against woman particularly have a sexual violence against woman and violation of woman’s human right, These responses include enforcement of existing law as a part of law of tort the law of assault, what we can do as a lawyer we can support, women and girls access to quality multi sector service essential for their safety.  While preventing women against the violation them the multi sector organization plays an important role play. The health can provide comprehensive services, sanitize and train health care provider in responding to the need of survivors holistically and empathetically.  We can promote gender norms as a part of life skills and comprehensive sexuality education curricular teach to young people. 

The world health organization response to violation against woman is building the evidence based on the size and nature of violation against women in different settings and supporting countries improving the methods for measuring violation against women in the context of monitoring for the sustainable development goals. They developed guidelines and implementation tools for strengthening evidence on what work to prevent such violation.     

There are a number of laws related to against the woman like the in India the Protection of Women from Domestic Violation Act 2005 is passed by the parliament of India to protect women from Domestic violence. It was come into force by the Ministry of Women and Child Development on 26 October 2006. This Act provide the definition of domestic Violence which include not only physical violation, but also other form of violation  such as emotional, verbal, sexual, and economical abuse. 

Pursuant to the Act, the aggrieved person is define as any woman who is, or has been in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who allege to have been subjected to domestic violation by the respondent. This law protects not only women from violation within their husband wife relationship but women, living in the home with people with whom they are domestic relationship with. This protects women from violence within their relationship by marriage like ex: husband, wife, daughter-in-law, father-in-law, mother-in-law etc. relationship by blood like ex: father-daughter, sister-brother, relationship by adoption like, adopted daughter-father, and even relationships, legally invalid marriages. The act was considered to be the first piece of legislation to provide legal recognition and protection to relationship and relationship outside of marriage. 

Rights of woman under the protection of women from domestic violence act 2005, a woman can apply for a protection order for monetary relief, a custody order, a residence order. Free legal advice and service under the legal services authority act, 1987. File a complaint under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The person also have right to reside in the shared home regardless of whether or not she has any title or ownership over the home.      


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree