Skip to main content

Rights of Women and Children In A Live-In Relationship

 Rights of Women and Children in A Live-In Relationship

By Shagun Mahendroo

In addition to providing legal protection to live-in relationships, the Indian judiciary has provided additional protection to partnerships resulting from live-in relationships, demonstrating its role as the caretaker of its residents. In many cases, the woman partner's right to preserve and inherit property has been upheld by the courts. The rights of children born out of such live-in relationships have been protected by Indian courts.

Section 125 of the CrPC gives the right to maintenance:

Palimony is a term that is widely used to describe maintenance in live-in relationships. The right to maintenance is covered by Section 125 of the CrPC. in India. This clause, which was established to help 'destitute' wives, helpless minor children, and elderly parents is now applicable to the indigent partner of live-in partnerships.

A revision was made in response to the Malimath Committee on Criminal Justice Reforms' recommendation to amend Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code and change the definition of "wife" therein. Women who were in a live-in relationship and were later abandoned by their spouse have the legal status of a wife, according to the current legal situation.

The Supreme Court overturned the prior decision in Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kushwah, upholding the ability of a woman in a live-in relationship to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC. The rationale for granting such a privilege to a woman in a live-in relationship is to ensure that a male does not take advantage of legal loopholes by enjoying the benefits of a de facto marriage while failing to fulfil the marriage's responsibilities.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court stated in Kamala v. Mohan Kumar that the term 'wife' should be given a purposive interpretation to further the ideals of social justice and defend the right to dignity of individuals inherent in the Constitution. Long cohabitation between the woman and the man resulted in the presumption of marriage, and the Court decided that the woman was entitled to support for herself and their children.

Thus, the judicial standing is that a woman in a live-in relationship enjoys a similar right to maintenance akin to legally wedded wives.

Women's Right to Inherit Property:

The Court confirmed a woman's ability to inherit property when her live-in boyfriend died in Dhannulal v. Ganeshram to settle a property dispute. Family members said in the court that their grandfather had been cohabiting with a woman for the previous 20 years. They also claimed that she was not eligible to inherit the land after their grandfather died because she was not married to him.

The Court disagreed, ruling that "where the man and woman lived together as husband and wife, the law will presume that they were living together in a lawful marriage."

Children Born Out of a Live-in Relationship's Legal Status:

For the first time in Balasubramanyam v. Suruttayan, children born out of live-in partnerships were granted legal validity. According to the Supreme Court, if a man and woman live together and cohabit for a long time, there is a presumption of marriage under Section 114 of the Evidence Act. As a result, the children born to them will be regarded genuine and entitled to a piece of the ancestral estate.

The Supreme Court in Bharatha Matha v. Vijeya Renganathan gave children born from live-in partnerships a share of their parents' property. The Court decided that children born to live-in relationships could not be considered illegitimate if the relationship lasted long enough. In a recent landmark decision, the Kerala High Court recognised a child born in a live-in relationship for adoption as a child born to a married couple.


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B