Skip to main content

Section 467: Forgery

 

                                              Section 467: Forgery



Introduction

In today's world, it's fairly usual to come across scenarios when someone receives an unauthorized benefit through forging. Forgery can take numerous forms, including signature forgery, document fabrication, electronic record forgery, and so on. It is well known that the Indian Penal Code, 1860, functions as Armour in defending Indian residents from different offences through its provisions. Forgery is also included in this category.


Meaning

The production, addition, or alteration of any writing, record, instrument, stamp, register, deed, or other document in a false manner to the detriment of another individual's right is referred to as forgery. It is an illegal act motivated by the aim to defraud. When an instrument is forged, it is altered in such a way that it has legal value or can be used to establish legal liability if it is passed off as genuine.

According to Section 463 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 forgery occurs when a person creates false documents or electronic records, or a portion of such documents or records, with the intent to cause injury or damage to the public or another person, or to support a particular claim or title, or to cause another person to part with property or enter into any express or implied contract, with the intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed. Wills, deeds, patents, cheques, certificates of authentication, identification documents, medical prescriptions, contracts, and other documents are frequently forged.


Elements of forgery as per Section 463 of IPC

  • The document or electronic record or the part of it should be false in fact

  • Such document or electronic record or any part of it should be created dishonestly or fraudulently

  • Such creation of a false document or electronic record or any part of it should be done with an intention to –

  • Cause injury or danger to the public or any individual.

  • Cause any individual to part with property.

  • Support any claim or title.

  • Enter into any express or implied contract.

  • Commit fraud or that fraud may be committed.


In the case of Sushil Suri v. CBI and Others, the aforementioned elements were established (2011). It is important to note that the term "fraud" in Section 463 of the IPC relates to the infringement of an individual's legal right, and that the purpose to defraud entails the intent to deceive and cause legal harm. A case of forgery, on the other hand, can only be made where there is an element of fraud in the creation of a fraudulent document or electronic record, or a portion of one.


General defenses to forgery

There are certain general defenses to protect oneself from the allegation of forgery, they are as follows –


  • Absence of intent– In every case of forgery, the element of intent is the most important component in determining the crime. As a result, if the person accused of forgery has no intention of committing the crime, they cannot be found guilty.

  • Coercion– If a person accused of forgery establishes that he was forced to conduct forgery as a result of coercion or any other threat leading to coercion, that person cannot be found guilty.

  • Lack of knowledge– If the person accused of forgery establishes that they had no knowledge that the document or legal instrument in question was forged, they will not be found guilty of forging.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more