Skip to main content




BY- swatee shukla 

In usual situations, a person is liable for his own wrongful acts and does not incur any liability for acts done by others. However, in certain cases, a person can be held liable for the acts done by others i.e. A can be held liable for a wrong committed by B. In order that A can be held liable, there should be a special relationship between A and B, and the wrongful act should be, in a certain way, connected with that relationship. Such liability of a person for an action or omission of another is called vicarious liability. When an agent commits a tort in the course of the performance of his duty as an agent, the principle can be held liable. The agent is also liable as he has committed the act himself. In essence, both the principal and agent can be held liable for the wrongful act. The plaintiff has the option to either sue the principal, the agent, or both of them. The same principle would be applicable when a wrongful act is done by a partner in an ordinary course of business of the firm. All the other partners would be vicariously liable for the same. The same rule applies to the relationship between a master and a servant. The master is vicariously liable for the wrongful act done by the servant in the course of employment. The liability of the master is in addition to that of the servant.  

In the case of a servant in the course of employment who does a wrongful act, then both the master and servant can be held liable for that act. The wrongful act of servant is deemed to be the act of master as well. The doctrine of the liability of the master for the act of his servant is based on two Latin terms. First, ‘Respondeat superior’ means ‘let the principle be liable’, and it puts the master in a position as though he had done the act himself. The logic behind this maxim is that the principal is in a better position to meet the claim as he is placed in a better position financially. The second Latin term is ‘Qui facit per alium facit per se’ this means ‘he who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself.

An agent is someone who acts on your behalf, i.e. an agent is someone who is authorized to do an act by another person and consequently, acts on his behalf. The authority is to do the act may be express r implied. The principal may not expressly ask his agent to do the wrongful act but when the agent acts in the ordinary course of the performance of his duties as an agent, the principal becomes liable for the same. 

The relationship between partners, in a partnership firm, is similar to that existing between a principal and agent. They are all considered as acting jointly for the purpose of business. For the tort committed by any partner in the ordinary course of business of the firm, all other partners are liable to the extent as the guilty partner. For this purpose, any one of the partners, some of them in any possible combination or even all of them together can be sued. That is, the partners are liable jointly or severely.  


Popular posts from this blog

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B