Skip to main content

Duties of Guardian

 DUTIES OF GUARDIAN


According to Section three of the Indian Majority Act, 1875, someone domiciled in the Republic of

India who is below the age of eighteen years, is a minor and a guardian is the caretaker of a minor,

his or her property, or both. The duty of a guardian is to ensure the welfare of the minor and look

after his  health and education.

Guardianship under Hindu Law:

The law of guardianship is not laid down in ancient texts, it was developed by the courts during the

British regime. Under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 a guardian can be defined as

"a person having the care of the person of the minor or of his property or both person and property.”

To ensure the welfare of the child is the priority of a guardian, it includes both physical and moral

well-being

There are three types of guardians:

Natural Guardians: Hindu Law recognises only three natural guardians of minor children- the father

is the natural guardian and after his death, mother becomes the natural guardian of the children and

in case of married minor girl, her husband is her guardian. Section 13 of the Hindu Minority and

Guardianship Act lays down that welfare of children is paramount to father's right of

guardianship. The position of adopted children is same as natural born children. In case of

illegitimate children, mother becomes the natural guardian of the child even if the father is alive.  

Testamentary Guardians: Under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, testamentary

power of appointing a guardian has been conferred on both parents by the way of will. The guardian

of a minor girl will cease to be the guardian of her person on her marriage, and the guardianship

cannot revive even if she becomes a widow while a minor. It is necessary for the testamentary

guardian to accept the guardianship, it may be express or implied. 

Guardians Appointed by the Court: The district courts are empowered to appoint guardians under

the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The District Court may appoint or declare any person as the

guardian whenever it considers it necessary for the welfare of the child. The District Court has the

power to appoint or declare a guardian in respect of the person as well as separate property of the

minor. Such guardians are also called Statutory Guardian.

Guardianship by affinity: The guardian by affinity is the guardian of a minor widow. In Paras Ram

V. State, it was held that the nearest sapinda of the husband automatically becomes a guardian of the

minor widow on the death of her husband. 

De Facto Guardian: A de facto guardian is a person who takes continuous interest in the welfare of

the minor's person or in the management and administration of his property without any authority of

law.


Guardianship under Muslim Law

The source of law of guardianship and custody are certain verses in the Koran and a few ahadis.

Guardians are classified int following categories:

Natural Guardians: In both the Sunnis and the Shias, the father is recognised as natural guardian and

the mother is not recognised as a guardian, natural or otherwise, even after the death of the father.

Father’s guardianship extends only to legitimate children not illegitimate ones. Mother is not

guardian of even illegitimate children but only a custodian. Among the Sunnis, after the death of the

father, the guardianship passes on to the executor. Among the Shias, after the father, the

guardianship belongs to the grandfather.

Testamentary Guardian: A testamentary guardian may be a one that is appointed as guardian of a

minor beneath a will. Only father or, in his absence, paternal grandfather has the right to appoint a

testamentary guardian. A non-Muslim and a feminine might also be appointed as a testamentary

guardian. However, under Shia law, a non- Muslim cannot be chosen as a testamentary guardian.

Guardian appointed by the Court: On the failure of the natural guardians and testamentary

guardians, the kazi was entrusted with the power of appointment of guardian of a Muslim minor.

The appointment of a guardian by the court is ruled by the Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890.


Guardianship Under Christian Law

The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 is resorted to in case of Christian minors. According to section

17 a guardian is appointed by the court keeping in mind several factors such as religion of the

minor, the character and capacity of the proposed guardian and if the minor is old enough, his

preference is taken into consideration. As per section 24, a guardian of the person of a ward is

charged with the custody of the ward and must look to his support, health and education, and such

other matters as the law to which the ward is subject requires.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree