Skip to main content

Nature of International Law

 Nature of International Law

By: Anjali Tiwari

Previously, international law was entirely based on municipal law, which was regarded as natural law for the same reason. The question of whether international law is true law or not arose with the arrival of the nineteenth century, i.e., due to positivists, and the solution to this question varies depending on the definition of law offered by various jurists. As a result, there are two opposing viewpoints on this issue. International law, according to positivists, does not exist and is simply a set of positive morality standards. They claim that international law cannot exist because there is no worldwide legislature to create it, no international administration to enforce it, and no efficient international court to develop it or resolve disputes over it. They claim that because there is no higher authority to enforce the law, the states have little regard for it and so have no incentive to obey it, only obeying it when it benefits them personally.

Modern jurists, on the other hand, hold that international law is as much a legal system as any other municipal legal system, and that it is not a set of positive morality principles. Worldwide communities and persons who perform international business in various roles regard international law as very important. Even a State that wishes to circumvent an inconvenient rule of international law would not deny the existence of international law as a whole, but would justify its action by either contesting the rule's existence, invoking another rule that applies to its situation, or claiming that the rule should be modified to fit a new situation.

Natural Law, or divine law, was the foundation of earlier theorists' theories on international law. Following that, two schools of thought emerged: the Naturalist School, as illustrated by Samuel Pufendorf, who believed that International Law was based on the Law of Nature, and the Positivist School, who believed that International Law was distinct from Natural Law and mostly derived from the same method as the Renaissance, namely the empirical method. The nineteenth century was a period of practical positivism. The Industrial Revolution mechanized Europe, established the capital-labor economic divide, and advanced western dominance over the world. Also, the wave of democracy had a significant political impact, and everybody had a say in the matter; war became everyone's responsibility, and massive national armies were replaced by tiny professional forces. As a result of these numerous reasons, a variety of public and private international organizations arose, resulting in the formation of international law to bind them.

Previously, the term "Law of Nations" was used instead of "International Law." In 1780, Jeremy Bentham coined the term "international law." Oppenheim, Brierly, Torsten Gill, Hackworth, Fenwick, and Schwarzenberger all gave distinct definitions of international law; since international law has been defined by focusing on diverse factors time and time again, there can be no single generally acceptable definition. The following are some of the definitions: 

International law, according to Oppenheim, is the designation for the corpus of customary and conventional laws that are considered legally enforceable by civilized nations. Briefly defined it as "the corpus of laws and principles of action that bind civilized governments in their mutual relations, whether they are at odds or at peace."

International law, according to Hackworth, is a set of norms that governs state-to-state relations. It is a legal system that has grown, for the most part, from the experiences and requirements of circumstances that have arisen from time to time.

It is defined by Fenwick as a set of broad principles and particular regulations that bind members of the international community in their interactions.

There are many other definitions that reflect the law's enormous extent, and a distinct definition would tend to limit the subject's scope. In its purest form, international law can be defined as the sum of the rules accepted by nation states to determine their code of conduct toward each other and their subjects; in its broadest sense, this law governs people all over the world, regardless of political and geographical constraints, color, creed, or religion. States are treated as entities in international law, regardless of their size or power. It lays out rules and regulations for nation states to follow, and it expects them to do so. Because the scope and form of international law is evolving, these norms now apply to international institutions, non-state enterprises, and individuals as well


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...

business tips

1. Have a clear vision for your business and strive to achieve it. 2. Hire great people and give them ownership in the company. 3. Provide excellent customer service. 4. Establish yourself as an expert in your field. 5. Develop relationships with key suppliers, customers, and partners. 6. Keep track of your finances and invest in marketing and innovation. 7. Utilize digital platforms to reach a larger audience. 8. Take calculated risks and back yourself. 9. Continuously strive to improve your products and services. 10. Make customer satisfaction your priority.

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...