Skip to main content

Remedies for Breach of Contract

 Remedies for Breach of Contract

By Shweta Nair


When a contract is breached, it is discharged. However, the party aggrieved by such breach gets certain new rights and can take action against erring party. The remedies which are available in case of breach of contract are as follows –


  • Suit for Damages


Damages means monetary compensation. Ordinarily under Indian Civil Law, a party aggrieved by breach of contract has to claim monetary compensation. This is considered to be his primary remedy and the preferred mode of action. 


Types of Damages: 

  1. Compensatory Damages or Actual Damages or Ordinary Damages

These are the damages which is actually caused to the plaintiff i.e., it is the monetary loss which would ordinarily occur in such circumstances. It is the amount of money that shall be granted to the plaintiff to compensate him for the loss caused. 

It is this type of damages which are normally granted by the courts of law in cases of breach of contract. 


  1. Nominal Damages 

Sometimes, it may so happen that even if a contract is breached, the other party does not suffer any loss. However, the fact remains that his legal right has been infringed. Therefore, the court shall grant to such party (Albeit, a small amount because in India, the civil law does not focus on punishment.) This small amount granted as damages to establish the fact that the other party has not honoured his legal commitment is known as Nominal Damages. 


  1. Exemplary Damages or Vindictive Damages

These are damages which are claimed over and above the actual damages caused for the stress, tension, anger, depression etc. caused due to the breach of the contract. Ordinarily, in Indian Law, vindictive damages are not granted. However, traditionally exemplary damages have been granted in India in 2 cases- 

  1. Breach of a promise to marry. 

  2. Unfair Dishonour of a cheque by the bank. 


However, nowadays the trend has been seen to change and the courts have started granting vindictive damages even in other cases. 

For example, in one case, a lady booked a local musical band to play a live orchestra during her wedding reception. The band failed to show up. She was granted exemplary damages. 


  1. Liquidated and Penalty or Punitive Damages

Sometimes, the parties to the contract may decide amongst themselves the amount of money to be paid in case the contract is breached. Such pre-fixed and pre-decided damages are called as liquidated damages. However, the rule regarding this type of damages is as follows: 


Liquidated Damages may be used as a ceiling or an upper limit for the damages to be paid in case of breach i.e., if the amount of damages or loss actually occurred is more than the pre-decided amount. The aggrieved party shall only have to pay the amount which was fixed and not more. 


However, if the amount of loss actually caused is less than that which was decided amongst the parties then only the actual amount will be generated and not the pre-decided amount then only the actual damages shall be allowed because any amount higher than that would serve as a penalty or punishment to the defaulting party. And Indian Civil Law does not propagate punitive damages. Hence, damages by way of penalty are not usually allowed in Indian Law. It is to be noted that in English Law, punitive damages can be granted. 


  • Special Damages

Special Damages are those damages which would not have ordinarily occurred but which have occurred due to the existence of special circumstances. Special Damages cannot be demanded as a matter of right. Special Damages shall only be granted if the existence of special circumstances were communicated to the other party at the time of entering into the contract itself. 

Case- Hadley v. Baxendale 


  • Rules regarding Damages: 


  1. In case of a breach of contract, the aggrieved party shall only be granted the normal and natural damages which would occur in such a situation.

  2. Remoteness of Damages shall not be allowed i.e., only those losses which directly arose due to the breach of contract shall be allowed i.e., the casual connection between the act of breach and the loss has to be without any intervening circumstances. 

  3. The court shall take into existence the means which existed for remedying the loss caused due to the breach of contract. The law feels that it is the moral responsibility of the aggrieved party to keep the losses at the bare minimum possible. Hence, unnecessary expenses incurred due to the excuse of other party’s breach shall not be allowed. 

  4. Quantum Merit- Quantum merit means as much as is merited. If due to any reason, a contract has to be abandoned mid-way (not due to the fault of the party, then any party who has completed a certain percentage of his contractual obligation shall be paid the proportionate amount in relation to the total consideration for the work which he has already done. 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree