Skip to main content

Right of Government to make Economic Reforms

 RIGHT OF THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE ECONOMIC REFORMS

The states of the Indian Union have been vested with jurisdiction over important areas and assigned independent sources of tax and other revenues and are fairly autonomous within their spheres. However, the states’ powers are circumscribed by: a list of concurrent powers; powers given to Parliament to legislate with respect to any matter in the state list under certain conditions (Article 250); a requirement to obtain the president’s approval of proposals for state legislation in areas of concurrency before they can be enacted; and the placing in Entry 52 of the Union list Industries, the control of which by the Union, is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest.

With respect to a subject in the concurrent list, supremacy is given to the law passed by Parliament. Furthermore, the president can supersede a state government if he or she determines that there is a breakdown of the Constitution or a financial emergency subject to the approval of Parliament.

These provisions make the Indian Constitution a quasi-federal one. To be sure, these Constitutional powers given to the Union (central) government in this regard are in the nature of enabling provisions, to be used when necessary in the national interest. So in practice, states could have had autonomy over broad areas of policy. Since, the economic reform policies are also made with the national interest, the aforesaid provisions enable the government to make the economic reform policies for the nation.

IMPACT OF ECONOMIC REFORMS ON THE WORKING CLASS

The economic reforms or liberalization initiated by the Government of India in the beginning of July 1991 brought in sweeping changes to the Indian economy. It sought to unshackle the economy from the numerous restrictions imposed by the license and quota raj. Even though belated attempts to liberalize the Indian economy were made from the early 1980s, radical steps in that direction were made in 1991. The objectives of the Indian economic reforms, backed by the IMF and the World Bank, were to open different sectors of the economy to the forces of global trade. Hence, the Indian economic reforms are nothing but integrating the Indian economy with global trade and commerce by making structural adjustments in tune with global practices.

Even though a decade has passed since the reform measures have been initiated, it is still a matter of debate whether the reforms have been beneficial to India or not. What is seen from different studies by scholars and academician is that the economic reforms are not really proving beneficial to the working class. An analysis of the Industrial relations in the pre – reform period (1981–90) shows that as against 402.1 million man days lost during the decade (1981–90) the number of man days lost declined to 150.5 million during 1991–97 – the post reform period. The economic reforms have strengthened the hands of the managements and owners and are anti-labor in spirit. Currently, employers are using different strategies like out – sourcing, permanent contractual employees, etc. to reduce the cost of production and in the process hurting the genuine interests of the workers and the working class.

Consequently, the workers are being pushed from the organized to the unorganized sector. The economic reforms in India have created an anti worker environment. However, what should give hope is the fact that the judiciary is gradually becoming critical of its judgments concerning trade unions and workers rights. To quote Justice G S Singhvi, a Division Bench Judge, the attractive mantras of globalization and liberalization are fast becoming the raison d’etre of the judicial process, and an impression has been created that the constitutional courts are no longer sympathetic towards the plight of industrial and unorganized workers. Hence, Trade Unions would continue to remain relevant provided they adopt a pragmatic and realistic approach in spreading its popularity and solving the genuine problems of the workers.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more