Skip to main content

Scope and Problems of Legal Language

 Scope and Problems of Legal Language

By: Anjali Tiwari

Legal Language

The term "legal language" refers to the terminology used by lawyers and other legal professionals. A lawyer, a jurist, and a legislative draughtsman use different vocabulary in their respective professions. Law has its own registry because it is a technical subject. Two examples of legal languages are local legal language and English.

In his lexicon, Webstar defines it. The name 'Lingua' is derived from the Latin word 'Lingua,' which refers to a system of human communication based on written or spoken symbols. It's a dialect that's specific to a certain ethnic, national, or criminal group. It is a system of sounds and words that humans use to communicate with one another. It is the verbal or nonverbal expression of thoughts and feelings.

In India, a legal language is defined as a language that is not written in English and is supposed to evolve through the medium of a regional language or Hindi.

Nature and scope of legal language

People from various areas of life hear and are influenced by legal jargon. Some people may follow the law, while others may not. It is possible to speak about communication between the lawgiver and the lawmen. It is in the shape of a statue. The language of the laws is highly technical, and lawmakers have little control over it; however, drafters ensure that the law's aim is communicated. Giver’s Communication between the judge and the council is two-way because both are well-versed in the law. Similarly, while speaking to the court, formal communication between the two opposing councils is the situation. In this brief statement, judgments and briefs are used. In the third scenario, informal consultation occurs in chambers between two or more judges, or in council offices or bars between two or more council members, or in jurisprudential decisions between men of law. Finally, there is the consultation between a layperson and an attorney. The latter's work is more difficult since he must offer legal structure and vocabulary to the client's everyday language because the former may be unfamiliar with the law.

Legal communication can be characterised in five categories of situational situations, according to Ashok K. Kelkar:

1. The law-givers to the judge and counsel statutes, as well as the preface to statutes

2. Judge to counsel, counsel to judge-judgment, briefs, court-room exchange, preamble-like portion of judgement, and briefs

3. The judge's brief, consultations with the jury, the counsel with the client, and the client with the lawyer.

4. Contracts, testaments, buy-laws, notices, and the like between ordinary citizens.

Importance of language in law

The terminology used in the legal system differs from that used in everyday life. The semantic differences are the most noticeable. There are three types of persuasive modes provided by the spoken word:

1. The first is determined by the speaker's personal characteristics.

2. The second focuses on putting the audience in a certain mindset, and

3. The third section focuses on the proof (or perceived proof) offered by the speech's words. This can be accomplished via (a) logical reasoning, (b) comprehending human nature and goodness in diverse forms, and (c) comprehending mental liberation. After all, the goal of every serious speech is to persuade the listeners of the truth, not to provoke feelings or to flatter the senses.

As a lawyer, you must have a unique vocabulary that includes words from outside the common language as well as words that are part of the general language but have fundamentally different meanings in legal and non-legal contexts.

The importance of language in law stems from the fact that it is not just a channel of communication, but also a medium of law, or, to put it another way, it is the law.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree