Skip to main content

social justice

 SOCIAL JUSTICE 


social justice is a concept that kicked off in the 18th century europe , where there were rising problems of social injustice and discrimination , where those who come from penirous backgrounds were not included in the country's growth and development . it was a problem which was solved by the advocates of that time who fought for the concept called as social justice which included and batted for inclusive methods for the people and to get them into the mainstream without any further discrimination . the concept of social justice which initiated in the 18th century and was focused about the growth and development in terms of ecomic condition of the masses, saw a shift in approach and got widened to almost all aspects of life from political to social to economic to employment to growth opportunities and development aspecats 


social justice 

social justice is inclusiveness of all the classes in the mainstream without any injustice and discrimination . it is about providing people with equal opportunity to meet with the changing dynamics of the society . and it is the basis of establishing the ideal society . 


india is a nation of over a billion people who are different in classes , creed , gender and religious political inclination , for the inclusion and development of the nation withput any hurdles it is important for the founding fathers to include such provisions which provides growth without any dissemination and discrimination which in any way can hamper the growth of the great nation .


indian constitutional drafting committee included such provision in the constitution like 

1) article 14 - right to equality 

2) artice 15 - right to equal opportunity 

3) article 17 - right against exploitation 

4) article 25- right to freedom of religion 

5) article 32 - writs in the constitution 

6) article 142 - judicial review

7) article 19 - right to freedom of choice 

8) article 21 - right to freedom of life 

9) article 22-23 - right against exploitation 


indian democracy is beautiful because it provides for such provisions which make social justice prevalent in the society and the growth of people become sure . indian founding fathers had a great initiative of holding the nations pride by providing for the rights to the people .


CONCLUSION 

INDIAN DEMOCRACY IS THE LARGEST FUNCTIONING DEMOCRACY IN THE WORLD THAT TAKES UP THE SALIENT KEY ROLE TO ACHIEVE SOCIAL EQUALITY AND JUSTICE IN A VERY COMPREHENSIBLE WAY . JUSTICE IS ASSOCIATED WITH PRESUMPTION OF FAIR , TREATMENT , PROVISION OF EQUAL RIGHTS AND ACCESS TO THE SOCIAL JUSTICE . IT IS AN IMPORTANT PERIPHERAL OF WELFARE IN THE SOCIETY . INDIAN CONSTITUTION PROVIDES FOR IT IN THE PREAMBLE AND VARIED PROVISIONS SPREAD ACROSS VARIOUS ARTICLES OF THE CONSTITUTION . EXAMPLE – SOCIALIST , SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE . EQUALITY THAT CLEARLY MEANS THAT THE STATE HAS BEEN INVOLVED FOR A LONG TIME IN THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AND STRIVE TO ESTABLISH AN EQUITABLE SOCIETY. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more