Skip to main content

The Sexual Harassment of Women at workplace Act 2013

 The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibit and Redressal) Act, 2013

By: Robin Pandey                                                                       Date: 23/February/ 2022

After 14 years of the Vishaka judgment and many draft Bills on the issue finally this Act came into force with effect from 9th December, 2013 The Act not only symbolizes the India's commitments under CEDAW [Convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women] but also reflects culmination of the Apex Court's initiatives, towards a meaningful legislation and safer work place environments for women.  This reflects the constant toil, relentless efforts and workouts by various organizations and public spirited individuals This is a positive step towards recognition of women's basic rights as human rights as included in the Vienna Accord, 1994 and Beijing Women's Conference, 19% This Act is enacted to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace and for the prevention and redressal of complaints of sexual harassment and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act seeks to cover all women irrespective of their age or employment status and protect them against sexual harassment at all workplace both in public and private sector whether organized or unorganized. Thus, the objective of the Act is to provide free from all forms o safe, secure and enabling environment to every woman free from all sexual harassment by fixing the responsibility of the employer by lay1ng down a statutory redressal mechanism. The Act is objective, comprehensive and pre It is divided into eight chapters that comprise a total of 30 Sections.

Sexual Harassment Section 2(n)|

 Sexual Harassment" includes any one or more of the following unwelcome acts or behaviour (whether directly or by implication) namely: 

(i) physical contact and advances; or 

(ii) a demand or request for sexual favours; or (ii) making sexually coloured remarks; or

 iv) showing pornography: or

 (v) any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.

Prevention of Sexual Harassment |Section 31]

(1) No woman shall be subjected to sexual harassment at any workplace.

 (2) The following circumstances, among other circumstances, if it occurs or is present in relation to or connected with any act or behaviour of sexual harassment may amount to sexual harassment.

(i)implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment in her employment; or implied or explicit threat of detrimental treatment in her employment or

(ii) implied or explicit threat of detrimental treatment in her employment or  

(iii) implied or explicit threat about her present or future employment  status; or

 (iv) interferes with her work or creating an intimidating or offensive or hostile work environment for her; or 

(v) humiliating treatment likely to affect her health or safety

Sexual harassment at the workplace" is defined in a comprehensive manner, keeping with the definition laid down in the Vishaka judgment broadening it further to cover circumstances of implied or  explicit promise or threat to a woman’s employment prospects or creation of hostile work environment or humiliating treatment,  which  can affect her health or safety. This Section aims at preventing any kind of such behaviour which violates the dignity of working woman. 

Workplace (Section 2(O)

 Furthermore, the Act goes much further in defining the 'workplace' to include organizations, depart1nent, office, branch unit, etc. in the public and private sector, organized and unorganized, hospitals, nursing homes, educational institutions, sports institutes, stadiums, sports complex and any place visited by the employee during the course of employment including the transportation. For the first time, the act provides protection to regular/temporary/ad-hoc/daily wage employees, further for remuneration or not and can also include volunteers. This covers domestic workers too.

Redressal Mechanics [Sections 4&6]

The Act under Sections 4 and 6 creates a redressal mechanism in the form or al Complaints Committee (ICC) and Local Complaints Committee (LCC). The Act mandates that the Committee shall complete the inquiry within a time period of 90 days.  On completion of the inquiry, the report will be sent to the employer or the District Officer, as the case may be and they are mandated to take action on the report within 60 days. The Act under Section 19 casts a responsibility on every employer to create an environment which is free from sexual harassment.  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more