Skip to main content

What is an injunction? what are the various kinds of it? When it can be granted?

 What is an injunction? what are the various kinds of it? When it can be

granted?

By Shagun Mahendroo


What is the definition of an injunction?

Different jurists have presented different meanings of injunction:

Injunction, according to Halsbury, is a type of court action in which an order is

issued and granted to a party for doing or not doing anything.

The Barmi Dictionary says: An injunction is a court order that prohibits a

person from interfering with another's right or threatening to interfere with

another's right.

The High Court of Rajasthan defined an injunction in State of Rajasthan vs

Randheer Singh (A.I.R. 1972, Rajasthan 241), saying that an injunction is a

specific order of the court given to: To stop such a wrongful act from happening

again, or to stop such a threat from happening again.

Thus, an injunction is a court order issued at any stage of the case to maintain

the status quo of the disputed property until the case is finally resolved or

subsequent orders are issued.

Injunctions come in a variety of types. There are four types of injunctions:

1)Temporary injunction: A temporary injunction is an order granted by the

court to keep the property in its current state until the matter is finally resolved.

The effect of such an injunction lasts until the lawsuit is finally resolved or until

subsequent orders are issued. The major goal is to ensure the property's security,

protection, and preservation (Mohammad Hafiz Khan Vs Najiban Bibi, 1973,

JLJ 114)

2)Perpetual injunction: It is issued by a decree at the conclusion of a suit and

has an indefinite effect.

3) Prohibitory injunction: It is a sort of injunction in which a third party is

prohibited from performing any act, i.e. an order is issued prohibiting the third

party from performing any act.

4) Mandatory Injunction: The fourth form of injunction is this one. It is a type

of injunction in which a party is ordered to perform a certain conduct in a

specific manner.


When can injunction be issued?

The circumstances under which an injunction can be issued are listed in Rule 1,

Oder 39 of the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. When it is proven in a lawsuit, by

affidavit or otherwise, that: the disputed property has the potential to be

destroyed, damaged, or transferred; or if the defendant threatens or intends to

remove or consume his property with the intent to defraud; or if the defendant

threatens or intends to remove or consume his property with the intent to

defraud; or the defendant threatens to dispose of or harm the plaintiff's property.

Under the circumstances outlined above, the court can impose a temporary

injunction that will remain in place until the case is resolved or further orders

are issued to prohibit the property from:

 being demolished

 being harmed

 from being bought and traded

 from being taken away

 from being modified

 from being evicted or transferred to another location, and so on.

Example: In a money-recovery case, if the court determines that the defendant

is threatening to remove or consume property in order to thwart the decree's

execution, the court can issue an injunction (M/S Cosmopolitan Trading

Corporation V/s M/s Engineering Sales Corporation, A.I.R. 2001, Rajasthan

331).

Injunctions can also be obtained to prohibit defamatory material from being

published in a newspaper (Hari Shankar V/s Kailash Narayan, A.I.R. 1982,

Madhya Pradesh 47).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services

  Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services In the dynamic world of business, legal support is crucial to ensure smooth operations, mitigate risks, and navigate regulatory landscapes. Lexis and Company offers Virtual Corporate Law Services to businesses in the UK, USA, Canada, Singapore, Dubai, and Australia , assisting with mergers, acquisitions, business contracts, compliance, and corporate governance. Key Features of Virtual Corporate Law Services 1. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Legal Support We provide comprehensive legal services for mergers and acquisitions , including due diligence, structuring deals, drafting agreements, and navigating regulatory approvals. Benefits: Ensures smooth and legally sound M&A transactions. Minimizes risks during corporate restructuring. Protects your business interests in high-value deals. Trending Hashtags: #MergersAndAcquisitions #BusinessDeals #CorporateLaw #LegalSupport #VirtualLegalExperts 2. Business Contracts and Ag...

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...

Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43

 Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43 CITATION AIR 1966 SC 43 COURT Supreme Court of India JUDGES/CORAM Justice K.S. Shah and Justice R. Bachawat DATE OF JUDGEMENT 22.03.1965 Facts: The facts of the case are as follows: The appellant was a dealer in a food grains at Dhar in Madhya Pradesh prosecuted in the Court of Additional District Magistrate for possessing in stock maunds and 21/4 seers of wheat for the purpose of sale without license. Subsequently appellant was charged for committing an offence under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Thereafter the appellant pleaded there was no intention to contravene any provisions of the law and the grains were stored upon filing an application for license and upon believe that it will be issued to him. The appellant further stated that he continued to submit returns on the food grains stored and purchased to the respected authority. Thus, the appellant was acquitted in the Court of Additional District Magistra...