Skip to main content

Capital Punishment in India

                 Capital Punishment in India

Historically, death penalty was a very common norm which was followed in India. As per Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPc), 1898 the death penalty was the default punishment for the offence of murder. But if the judge feels that the individual should be given life imprisonment rather than death penalty then there should be a reason stated in the Judgment. The reason should be clearly written and specified so that there should be no loophole present. With an amendment to the CrPc in 1955, the provision of specifying the reason for not imposing the death penalty was removed from which it can be inferred that there was no legislative preference between the two punishments. Further, in 1973, CrPc was amended again and around this time the norm was changed from death penalty to life imprisonment. That is why the death penalty was to be rewarded only in exceptional cases with special reasons. Else the life imprisonment was imposed. The amendment which took place in 1973 also separated the stages of criminal trial:

  1. One for Conviction.

  2. One for Sentencing.

In India, capital punishment is not only awarded in IPC offences but also in NON-IPC offences. The nature of crime in IPC are:

  1. Party to a criminal conspiracy

  2. Treason 

  3. Abetment of Mutiny

  4. Murder

  5. Kidnapping for ransom

  6. Rape of a child who is below 12 years

  7. Also includes gang rape of a child

  8. Dacoity

The nature of crime in NON-IPC offences are:

  1. Organizing crime which resulted in the death of the person in Andhra Pradesh Control of Organized Crime Act, 2001

  2. Offences committed related to the enemy in the Army Act, 1950

  3. Mutiny in Army Act, 1950

  4. Offences committed in relation to enemy and punishable with death in Assam Rifles Act, 2006

  5. Mutiny in Assam Rifles Act, 2006

  6. Desertion in Assam Rifles Act, 2006

  7. Civil offences in Assam Rifles Act, 2006

  8. Abetting Sati in The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987

  9. Grave breaches of Geneva Conventions in The Geneva Convention Act, 1960

  10. Repeated commission of offences involving commercial quantity of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

But there are many instances where this capital punishment is challenged in the court of law. Some of them are:

  1. In case of Bacchan Singh Vs State of Punjab, Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was challenged which stands for murder.

  2. Vikram Singh &Anr Vs. Union of India , Section 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was challenged which stands for Kidnapping for ransom.

  3. Indian Harm Reduction Vs Union of India, Section 31A(1)  of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

In all the above cases, the whole Section was not challenged rather the punishment was challenged which was awarded in the case. It is important to note down that there are many countries in which capital punishments are abolished for the reason that humanity is also something. It is neither a show happening nor a early age period where everything is tit for tat. Head for head, hand for hand, leg for leg. The punishment is important but its not like death penalty should be only awarded. Therefore, India is one of the country who has not abolished the capital punishment but there is a positive change and that is now it is not a common norm to give death penalty as a punishment. For the highest crime, judges feel life imprisonment. Capital punishment are only awarded in exceptional cases where the offence has happened in a very inhuman way and the country has not witnessed it till now.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more