Skip to main content

Council of Ministers

 Council of Ministers


There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such advice. 

The Council of Ministers is formed as soon as Prime Minister is sworn in.

Only prime minister alone can constitute Council of Ministers. After the 91st Amendment Act 2003, Article 75 (1A) states that strength of Union of Council of Ministers shall not increase 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha. 

The Council of Ministers consists of three categories of ministers, namely, Cabinet Minister, Minister of State, and Deputy Ministers. The difference lies in the respective ranks, emoluments, and political importance. Sometimes Deputy Prime Ministers are also included in the Council of Ministers.


Individual Responsibility


Every individual minister is in charge of specific ministry or ministries (or specific other portfolio). He is responsible for any act of failure in all the policies relating to his department. In in case of any lapse, he himself is individually responsible to the Parliament. 

If a vote of no-confidence is passed against the individual minister, he has to resign. Individual responsibility can amount to collective responsibility. Therefore, the Prime Minister, in order to save his government, can ask for the resignation of such a

minister and the people have a say.


Collective Responsibility


The Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers are jointly accountable to the Lok Sabha. If there is a policy failure or lapse on the part of government, all the members of the council are jointly responsible. If a vote of no-confidence is passed against the government, then all the ministers headed by the Prime Minister have to resign. 


Main Features of the Cabinet (or Parliamentary) Form of Government


  1. Cabinet or Council of Ministers forms the Real Executive


The Cabinet or the Parliamentary form of Government is that form in which the Cabinet or the Council of Ministers forms the real executive, consisting of the Prime Minister and his cabinet. 

The system evolved in England where the nominal executive is the king and the real executive is the Cabinet headed by the Prime Minister. In India, the President is the nominal executive and the Union Cabinet is the real executive. 

This, though we have a President, we do not have a Presidential form of Government. We have a Cabinet or Parliamentary form of Government.


  1. Formation of the Union Cabinet 


Immediately after the result of the elections to the Lok Sabha are declared, the President sends for the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha or a person who is in a position to win the confidence of the majority in that House and appoints him Prime Minister.

 The other Minister are appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Usually all the ministers belong to the same political party. 

The whole body of Ministers forms the Cabinet. It remains in in power as long as it enjoys the confidence of the Parliament.

 Ministers may be chosen from among members of either House. There is no bar to the appointment of a person from outside the legislature as a Minister but he must secure a seat in either House within 6 months, otherwise he cannot continue as a Minister.


  1. Composition of the Council of Ministers 


The number of members of the Council of Ministers is not specified in the constitution but there are three categories of Ministers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree