Skip to main content

legal opinion- disclosing rape victim identity

                               SHORT NOTE ON COUNSELLING 

FACTS:

Kanchan a rape victim has been summoned to appear in the court to depose as witness in support of the prosecution case filed on her complaint. She is nervous & is in double mind. She is very much conscious of her identity being known to the world & she is worried as to its adverse effect on her marriage, whose negotiation are in progress.

ISSUE:

Whether she can drop the case as she is conscious of  her identity being known to public or there is any provision in law so that she can witness without disclosing her identity.

LEGAL ASPECT:

Law provide harassment free & time bound investigation in the case of rape. Section 154(1) of the code of Criminal Procedure provided that the information given by a women against whom an offence of sexual assault has been committed. Such information shall be recorded by a women police officer or any women officer. Section 157 of Code of Criminal Procedure provided that the statement of the victim in relation to the offence of rape shall be conducted at the residence of the victim or in the place of her choice by a women police officer in the presence of her parents or guardian. 

Statement of the Rape victim shall be recorded by women magistrate in the chamber of women magistrate under section 164 (5-A) of Code of Criminal Procedure. If the victim or witness is mentally or physically disabled than analizer, educator, interpreter or socializer shall be appoint to decode the sign language of the victim or witness. It is recommended that any offence related to sexual assault shall be tried as far as practicable by the court presided over by a women magistrate or judge. 

Rape victim has right to trial with full dignity, speed & protection. No question should be asked that resulted into the character assassination, no question should be asked related to prior sexual history of the rape victim or witness. 

Section 327 of code of Criminal Procedure provided that the inquiry into and the trial of rape victim shall be conducted in cameras as far as practicable by a women judge or magistrate. Section 327 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure do not allow publication of the proceeding subject to maintaining confidentiality of name & address of the parties. If a person want the recording of the proceeding, required written permission from the judge or magistrate stating reason for what purpose recording shall be used. 

Section 173(1A) of the code of Criminal Procedure prescribed that the investigation shall be completed within 2 months from the date on which the information was recorded. Under section 309(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure prescribed that trial to be completed in 2 months from the date of filing of the charge sheet. The rape victim has the right to check on the court schedule program of 2 months trial duration under section 230 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

 In the case state of Kerala V. Rasheed (2019) Supreme Court held that witness should not be manipulated by the accused or anyone for that reason police should take care of full protection of the victim or witness from courtroom to their Home. No confrontation between the parties should be allowed for that matter individual waiting rooms in the court shall be allotted to both the parties. In case of threat police can install Cameras in the house of the victim & witness or relocate witness and victim to secret location in required.  In the case of Mahendra Chawala V. UOI (2018) witness protection scheme has been released which contain guidelines for the protection of witness in the cases of heinous crimes.

As far as identity of witness is concerned, if the witness did not want to disclose his/her identity, they shall be assigned with an new identity by the court.  

Evidence should be present in the court in the presence of accused, accused shall be informed about the evidence by electronic form if required. 

OPINION:

In my opinion Kanchan should not drop the case but witness the trail without disclosing her identity. She shall be assigned a new identity in that way she can avoid threats and she is unknown to the world. 

                 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more